Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
Peach Payments
Peach Payments looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
Peach Payments operates in Fintech, based in Cape Town, Africa. SA fintech startup Peach Payments raises $31m Series A funding round 0 By Tom Jackson on April 4, 2023 News , Southern Africa South African fintech startup Peach Payments has raised a US$31 million Series A funding round from Apis Partners to accelerate its growth across the continent and grow its product offering. Founded in Cape Town in 2012, Peach Payments provides a complete toolkit to help businesses accept, manage and disburse payments through web and mobile.
Sub-sector tags: fintech.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
Peach Payments has raised $31M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).
Largest single filing: $31M on 2023-04-04.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2023-04-04.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models Peach Payments at approximately $285M (range $41M–$820M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 4.44× the median modeled value of Series A Fintech companies in 2022–2024 (32 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Last raise 3.2 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 12 months.
Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 95% of Fintech peers (1063 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 94% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Thndr, Bite Ninja, Inc., Kinside Inc., Plerk Holdings LLC, GroMo, Inc..
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.