Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

OneEnergy, Inc.

OneEnergy, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

OneEnergy, Inc. operates in Other Energy, based in SEATTLE.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

OneEnergy, Inc. has raised $14M in disclosed capital across 6 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $4.7M on 2014-10-10.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2017-06-30.

Filings read as a recurring offering program rather than a clean venture-stage ladder — interpret stage labels and step-ups with that in mind.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models OneEnergy, Inc. at approximately $38M (range $4.6M–$205M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.59× the median modeled value of Series A Other Energy companies in 2016–2018 (47 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 3 months.

Last raise 9.0 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 12 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 7.3× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 75% of Other Energy peers (2049 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 66% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Depcom Power, Inc., Ubiquitous Energy, Inc., CleanCapital Portfolio 1, LLC, FINsix Corp, King River Royalties, LLC.

Peoplefiled

15 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.

Recurring-offering pattern: stage-based valuation has lower applicability.