Companies · Other Energy

OneEnergy, Inc.

SEATTLE · Other Energy

Diligence memoA one-page analyst read on OneEnergy, Inc. — recommendation, valuation, rhythm, risks.
$13.7M
Total raised · real
6
Rounds
7.3×
Latest step-up
Top 26%
Sector rank · raised
Recurring offerings
Latest stage · inferred · Fri Jun 30 2017 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)

OneEnergy, Inc. has raised $14M over 6 rounds; too few niche peers to rank its valuation yet.

Synthesized from the figures below est. — every claim rests on a number shown on this page. Valuation uses the energy sector profile.

Analyst read est. — computed against this company's niche peers in the same era. Inputs shown; not a quoted figure.

Program ended
  • Last raise 9.0 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 12 months.
  • For a recurring offering issuer, long silence usually means the offering program is inactive or ended; it is not proof the legal entity is defunct.

Procedural diagnosis est. — rule-based common-sense checks over the filing pattern, issuer name, activity cadence, and surfaced operating evidence.

Recurring offering issuermedium confidence

OneEnergy, Inc. behaves more like a recurring private-offering issuer than a conventional venture-backed operating company.

Issuer structure
Program-like
Frequent filings and follow-ons read more like a securities offering program than discrete startup rounds.
Lifecycle
14.5 yr record
Peak capital year was 2014 with $14.5M across 5 filings.
Market position
ahead of 75% of Other Energy peers
Capital scale is ahead of 75% of Other Energy peers; modeled value is above 66% of peers by modeled value. Large capital with mid-pack modeled value can signal an issuer/program profile rather than operating-company growth.
Valuation reliability
Lower applicability
Stage/dilution valuation models are weakest when the issuer is broad-sector, recurring, or vehicle-like.
Operating evidence
Sparse
No clear CEO/founder/principal role is surfaced, so operating-company confidence is lower.
Data quality
Needs review
Row-level filing totals differ from canonical totals, so amendment/superseded filtering should be checked.
What triggered this
  • 22 dated financing filings, averaging about 3 months apart.
  • No clearly named CEO/founder/principal role in the public records surfaced here.
  • No verified homepage on the profile yet.
  • Capital program peaked in 2014: $14.5M across 5 filings.
  • Largest single filing was $4.7M on 2014-10-10.
  • Filing rows sum to $40.9M, while canonical raised total is $13.7M; likely amendments/superseded rows are mixed into the detail view.
How to read the page
  • Read this less like a startup funding journey and more like a capital-raising program.
  • Stage-based valuation and peer labels have lower applicability for this pattern.
  • The more important signal is lifecycle: repeated filings ended years ago, so current activity needs outside confirmation.
  • Canonical filtering should be tightened before using row-level totals for diligence.
Leadership

No named principal in this company's public records yet — see all operators below.

Explore how these operators interlock with other companies in the operator network.

Where it sits in Other Energy

OneEnergy, Inc. is one of 2049 Other Energy companies tracked from SEATTLE. By capital raised it ranks in the upper tier (ahead of 75% of sector peers), and mid-pack by modeled valuation est..

Ranking is computed against this company's own sector cohort — reported capital is fact; valuation tiers are modeled.

As reported in public records reported — not modeled.

US
Jurisdiction
Rule 506(b)
Reg D exemption
15
Investors (latest)
2017-06-30
First sale
Amount raised vs valuation, by year

This issuer has a dense recurring filing history, so the chart groups filings by year. Solid bars are annual reported capital reported; hatched bars show the latest modeled value est. observed in that year. Use the toggles to overlay data labels and the niche-peer / market average value lines.

Annual capital raised · realLatest value in year · estCumulative funded · real

Dense history compressed: 22 filings shown as 6 yearly buckets. Hover a bucket for filing count, annual capital, and latest modeled value.

$0$13M$25M$38M$50M2011: 5 filings Raised $8.5M total (real) Latest modeled valuation $19M (est)20115 filings2012: 1 filing Raised $2.5M total (real) Latest modeled valuation $32M (est)20121 filings2013: 1 filing Raised $198K total (real) Latest modeled valuation $2.6M (est)20131 filings2014: 5 filings Raised $14M total (real) Latest modeled valuation $48M (est)20145 filings2016: 9 filings Raised $12M total (real) Latest modeled valuation $7.9M (est)20169 filings2017: 1 filing Raised $3.6M total (real) Latest modeled valuation $38M (est)20171 filings+$2.5M+$198K+$14M+$12M+$3.6MCumulative $41M

The line shows cumulative reported funding over the period; + labels show new capital added between points when there is room. Toggle on-bar figures, plus the niche-peer and market averages, to read this company against its cohort. Benchmarks are modeled medians.

Financing ladder & sequence gaps

This looks like a recurring offering series, so a VC stage ladder would be misleading. Showing the filed offering sequence instead.

Initial offering$1.3M · 2011
Follow-on offering$2.0M · 2011
Follow-on offering$1.5M · 2011
Follow-on offering$2.1M · 2011
Follow-on offering$1.5M · 2011
Follow-on offering$2.5M · 2012
Follow-on offering$198K · 2013
Follow-on offering$657K · 2014
Follow-on offering$782K · 2014
Follow-on offering$4.7M · 2014
Follow-on offering$4.7M · 2014
Follow-on offering$3.7M · 2014
Follow-on offering$1.1M · 2016
Follow-on offering$899K · 2016
Follow-on offering$1.3M · 2016
Follow-on offering$2.0M · 2016
Follow-on offering$1.4M · 2016
Follow-on offering$1.8M · 2016
Follow-on offering$1.5M · 2016
Follow-on offering$1.2M · 2016
Follow-on offering$489K · 2016
Follow-on offering$3.6M · 2017
Modeled valuation trajectory
$37.6M
Base estimate est.
$4.6M
Conservative case
$204.6M
Upside case
$16.2M
Modeled post-money

This issuer files recurring offerings, so the model treats stage labels as a loose sizing heuristic, not a clean VC ladder. The estimate anchors on reported filing amounts and dates, then applies benchmark dilution, survival, and markup assumptions. Directional, not a quoted figure.

Seed · modeled $17.2M · 2011-12-302011Seed · modeled $26.3M · 2011-12-30Seed · modeled $19.8M · 2011-12-30Seed · modeled $27.5M · 2011-12-30Seed · modeled $19.2M · 2011-12-30Seed · modeled $32.0M · 2012-12-30Seed · modeled $2.6M · 2013-12-05Pre-Seed · modeled $10.6M · 2014-01-29Seed · modeled $10.2M · 2014-01-29Series A · modeled $49.9M · 2014-10-10Series A · modeled $49.4M · 2014-10-10Seed · modeled $47.7M · 2014-10-10Seed · modeled $14.3M · 2016-06-09Pre-Seed · modeled $14.5M · 2016-06-09Seed · modeled $16.7M · 2016-06-09Series A · modeled $21.1M · 2016-06-09Seed · modeled $18.3M · 2016-06-09Seed · modeled $23.4M · 2016-06-09Seed · modeled $19.5M · 2016-06-09Seed · modeled $15.6M · 2016-06-09Pre-Seed · modeled $7.9M · 2016-06-09Series A · modeled $37.6M · 2017-06-302017
Model inputs · modeled:benchmark-stage-stepup-v1
22%
Dilution assumption
Implied ownership sold in the financing.
52%
Survival probability
28% low · 71% high
1.28×/yr
Annual markup
1.61×/yr upside case
6.0 yr
Elapsed time used
9.0 yr actual, capped for stale marks
energy
Sector profile
Adjusts growth and survival by industry.
Financing rhythm
3 mo
Avg between rounds
$2.5M/yr
Capital velocity
14.5 yr
On record since
2011
First round
22
Rounds on file
How it compares to the market

Benchmarked against 2049 companies in Other Energy. Each bar is a median (the middle company, not an average — outliers don't skew it). Two yardsticks: real money raised (reported on Form D) and modeled value (our estimate est.). These are whole-sector medians across all stages, except the per-stage row.

Total raised — vs sector median (real $, all stages) 4.0× above median
This company$13.7M
Sector median$3.4M
Modeled value — vs sector median (estimate, all stages) 2.2× above median
This company$37.6M
Sector median$17.0M

Raised more than 75% of sector peers (real $). Modeled value above 66% of peers (estimate).

Full financing history

This issuer files too frequently for VC stage labels to be meaningful, so rows are shown as initial/follow-on offerings est. instead of Pre-Seed/Seed/Series buckets.

StageAmount · realAnnouncedPost-money · estValue · estConf.
Initial offering$1.3M2011-12-30$6.6M$17.2M85%
Follow-on offering$2.0M2011-12-30$10.1M$26.3M85%
Follow-on offering$1.5M2011-12-30$7.6M$19.8M85%
Follow-on offering$2.1M2011-12-30$10.6M$27.5M85%
Follow-on offering$1.5M2011-12-30$7.4M$19.2M85%
Follow-on offering$2.5M2012-12-30$12.3M$32.0M85%
Follow-on offering$198K2013-12-05$988K$2.6M85%
Follow-on offering$657K2014-01-29$3.7M$10.6M85%
Follow-on offering$782K2014-01-29$3.9M$10.2M85%
Follow-on offering$4.7M2014-10-10$21.4M$49.9M90%
Follow-on offering$4.7M2014-10-10$21.2M$49.4M85%
Follow-on offering$3.7M2014-10-10$18.4M$47.7M85%
Follow-on offering$1.1M2016-06-09$5.5M$14.3M90%
Follow-on offering$899K2016-06-09$5.0M$14.5M85%
Follow-on offering$1.3M2016-06-09$6.4M$16.7M90%
Follow-on offering$2.0M2016-06-09$9.1M$21.1M90%
Follow-on offering$1.4M2016-06-09$7.1M$18.3M90%
Follow-on offering$1.8M2016-06-09$9.0M$23.4M90%
Follow-on offering$1.5M2016-06-09$7.5M$19.5M90%
Follow-on offering$1.2M2016-06-09$6.0M$15.6M90%
Follow-on offering$489K2016-06-09$2.7M$7.9M85%
Follow-on offering$3.6M2017-06-30$16.2M$37.6M90%
What happened at each round

Step-up, pace versus the sector's normal cadence, and revenue/exemption moves — read straight from the reported round facts reported.

  1. Initial offering$1.3M2011-12-30
    • First recorded raise — entered as Initial offering.
    • 14 investors on this round.
  2. Follow-on offering$2.0M2011-12-30
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.5× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 19 investors on this round.
  3. Follow-on offering$1.5M2011-12-30
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.3× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 17 investors on this round.
  4. Follow-on offering$2.1M2011-12-30
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.4× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 24 investors on this round.
  5. Follow-on offering$1.5M2011-12-30
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.4× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 16 investors on this round.
  6. Follow-on offering$2.5M2012-12-30
    • Raised 12 mo later, in step with the ~12 mo sector norm.
    • Round 1.7× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 24 investors on this round.
  7. Follow-on offering$198K2013-12-05
    • Raised 11 mo later, in step with the ~12 mo sector norm.
    • Round 12.5× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • Switched to Rule 506(c) (was Rule 06).
    • 3 investors on this round.
  8. Follow-on offering$657K2014-01-29
    • Came back fast: 2 mo vs the ~12 mo sector norm.
    • Round 3.3× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Switched to Rule 506(b) (was Rule 506(c)).
    • 14 investors on this round.
  9. Follow-on offering$782K2014-01-29
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 15 investors on this round.
  10. Follow-on offering$4.7M2014-10-10
    • Raised 8 mo later, in step with the ~12 mo sector norm.
    • Round 6.0× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 20 investors on this round.
  11. Follow-on offering$4.7M2014-10-10
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 19 investors on this round.
  12. Follow-on offering$3.7M2014-10-10
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 19 investors on this round.
  13. Follow-on offering$1.1M2016-06-09
    • Raised again after 20 mo — slower than the ~12 mo sector norm.
    • Round 3.3× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 4 investors on this round.
  14. Follow-on offering$899K2016-06-09
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 3 investors on this round.
  15. Follow-on offering$1.3M2016-06-09
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.4× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 4 investors on this round.
  16. Follow-on offering$2.0M2016-06-09
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.6× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 7 investors on this round.
  17. Follow-on offering$1.4M2016-06-09
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.4× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 5 investors on this round.
  18. Follow-on offering$1.8M2016-06-09
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 7 investors on this round.
  19. Follow-on offering$1.5M2016-06-09
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 7 investors on this round.
  20. Follow-on offering$1.2M2016-06-09
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 4 investors on this round.
  21. Follow-on offering$489K2016-06-09
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 2.4× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 3 investors on this round.
  22. Follow-on offering$3.6M2017-06-30
    • Raised 13 mo later, in step with the ~12 mo sector norm.
    • Round 7.3× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 15 investors on this round.
Intelligence
2017 ~Q4
Modeled next raise · ~3mo cadence
$10.7M
Modeled next size est.range $6.9M$17.1M
7.3×
Last step-up
$2.5M/yr
Capital velocity

Predictive signals are modeled est. from this company's own cadence and step-up, plus sector benchmarks — directional, not advice. Peer set and a CSV export live in your analyst workspace.

Key people & operators

Officers, directors and promoters named in this company's public recordsreported — the people who run it (not its investors). "Also runs" counts come from name-matching across all records, so verify before acting.

PersonRoleAlso runsTied since
Devin Whatley3 other2014-10
Kristin Martinez3 other2014-10
Bryce Smith2 other2011-12
Travis Bryan2 other2011-12
William Eddie2 other2014-10
Fred Hines1 other2011-12
Van Katzman1 other2011-12
Arlo Corwin2016-06
Ben Packard2011-12
Bill Eddie2011-12
Jeff Harris2011-12
Jennifer Barnes2014-10
Russ Wright2016-06
Scott Bixby2014-10
Steve Trainer2011-12
Registry & provenance

OneEnergy, Inc. is an official record sourced from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). U.S. data is aggregated from SEC Form D filings.

United States
Country of record
US
Jurisdiction
1539014
SEC CIK
Similar companies

Nearest neighbours across the whole database — matched on sector, stage and capital scale, and on shared operators (officers or directors named at both companies in public filings). A discovery shortlist, not a valuation cohort — verify before acting, the same way modeled figures are directional.

CompanySectorStageRaised · realValue · estWhy similar
OE WI Solar 2, LLCOther EnergyPre-Seed$509K$8.2Mnetwork3 shared operators · same sector
OneEnergy Development, LLCOther EnergyPre-Seed$200K$3.2Mnetwork3 shared operators · same sector
Brillouin Energy Corp.Other EnergySeries A$13.7M$48.2Msame sector · same stage
Solace Power Inc.Other EnergySeries A$13.7M$31.8Msame sector · same stage
Sun Catalytix CorpOther EnergySeries A$13.6M$42.3Msame sector · same stage
Otovo ASAOther EnergySeries A$14.0M$36.1Msame sector · same stage
Electricom, LlcOther EnergySeries A$13.3M$35.5Msame sector · same stage
EnZinc Inc.Other EnergySeries A$13.3M$29.2Msame sector · same stage
Semantically similar

Matched by meaning, not labels — a local language model reads each company's name, sector and description and ranks the closest in that learned space. This catches look-alikes that cross sector boundaries; the structured list above explains its matches, this one trusts the text. Directional, like every modeled signal here.

CompanySectorStageValue · estMatch
OneEnergy Development, LLCOther EnergyPre-Seed$3.2M97%
One Three Energy, Inc.Other EnergySeries A$6.1M92%
One Power CoOther EnergySeries A$22.4M91%
Simple Energy, Inc.Other EnergySeries A$2.1M91%
OneSun, Inc.Other EnergySeries B$44.3M90%
Purposeenergy IncOther EnergyPre-Seed$6.5M89%
One Scientific Inc.Other EnergyPre-Seed$10.5M89%
Stored Energy, Inc.Other EnergyPre-Seed$3.3M89%
Frequently asked
How much funding has OneEnergy, Inc. raised?
OneEnergy, Inc. has raised approximately $13.7M in disclosed capital across 6 recorded financing rounds, aggregated from public filings.
What is OneEnergy, Inc.'s estimated valuation?
Provath's modeled valuation for OneEnergy, Inc. is approximately $37.6M (modeled range $4.6M–$204.6M). This is an algorithmic estimate derived from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
What funding stage is OneEnergy, Inc. at?
OneEnergy, Inc. shows a recurring offering pattern rather than a clean VC stage progression. Its most recent recorded round closed around Fri Jun 30.
What does OneEnergy, Inc. do and where is it based?
OneEnergy, Inc. operates in the Other Energy sector, based in SEATTLE.
Explore related

See where OneEnergy, Inc. sits in the wider market — its sector, location and stage cohorts, each with their own leaderboards and capital-flow timelines.

Is this your company?

If you work at OneEnergy, Inc., claim this profile or suggest a correction. We aggregate from public filings, so help us keep your description, website and links accurate.

Is this your company? Update your profile or add contact details — and choose exactly who can reach you. Reviewed before anything is published.