Companies · Software / Tech

Nanocomp Technologies, Inc.

MERRIMACK · Software / Tech · refined from filed group “Other Technology

Diligence memoA one-page analyst read on Nanocomp Technologies, Inc. — recommendation, valuation, rhythm, risks.
$32.1M
Total raised · real
7
Rounds
1.0×
Latest step-up
Top 15%
Sector rank · raised
Series B
Latest stage · inferred · Wed Jan 25 2017 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)

Nanocomp Technologies, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

Synthesized from the figures below est. — every claim rests on a number shown on this page. Valuation uses the technology sector profile.

Analyst read est. — computed against this company's niche peers in the same era. Inputs shown; not a quoted figure.

Under-valued
  • Modeled value is 0.16× the median modeled value of Series B Software / Tech companies in 2016–2018 (78 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Dormant
  • Last raise 9.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 13 months.
  • Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
Leadership

No named principal in this company's public records yet — see all operators below.

Explore how these operators interlock with other companies in the operator network.

Where it sits in Software / Tech

Nanocomp Technologies, Inc. is one of 3920 Software / Tech companies tracked from MERRIMACK. By capital raised it ranks in the upper tier (ahead of 86% of sector peers), and mid-pack by modeled valuation est..

Ranking is computed against this company's own sector cohort — reported capital is fact; valuation tiers are modeled.

As reported in public records reported — not modeled.

US
Jurisdiction
Rule 506(b)
Reg D exemption
6
Investors (latest)
2017-01-25
First sale
Amount raised vs valuation, by round

Solid bars are reported offering amounts reported; hatched bars are the modeled post-money valuation est. — both on one shared scale so you can read raise-vs-worth at each round directly. Use the toggles to overlay data labels and the niche-peer / market average value lines.

Amount raised · realModeled valuation · estCumulative funded · real
$0$125M$250M$375M$500MPre-Seed · 2010-11-23 Raised $281K (real) Modeled valuation $12M (est)Pre-Seed2010Pre-Seed · 2010-11-23 Raised $281K (real) Modeled valuation $12M (est)Pre-Seed2010Pre-Seed · 2010-11-23 Raised $281K (real) Modeled valuation $12M (est)Pre-Seed2010Pre-Seed · 2010-11-23 Raised $281K (real) Modeled valuation $12M (est)Pre-Seed2010Series A · 2011-12-22 Raised $7.7M (real) Modeled valuation $213M (est)Series A2011Series A · 2013-03-06 Raised $140K (real) Modeled valuation $3.9M (est)Series A2013Series A · 2013-10-29 Raised $3.0M (real) Modeled valuation $83M (est)Series A2013Series B · 2014-12-19 Raised $15M (real) Modeled valuation $458M (est)Series B2014Series A · 2014-12-19 Raised $15M (real) Modeled valuation $416M (est)Series A2014Series B · 2016-03-31 Raised $3.0M (real) Modeled valuation $91M (est)Series B2016Series B · 2017-01-25 Raised $3.0M (real) Modeled valuation $90M (est)Series B2017Cumulative $48M

The line shows cumulative reported funding over the period; + labels show new capital added between points when there is room. Toggle on-bar figures, plus the niche-peer and market averages, to read this company against its cohort. Benchmarks are modeled medians.

Financing ladder & sequence gaps
Pre-Seed$281K · 2010
Pre-Seed extension$281K · 2010
Pre-Seed extension$281K · 2010
Pre-Seed extension$281K · 2010
Series A$7.7M · 2011no Seed on file
Series A extension$140K · 2013
Series A extension$3.0M · 2013
Series B$15.0M · 2014
Bridge · Series B-stage$15.0M · 2014smaller follow-on
Series B extension$3.0M · 2016
Series B extension$3.0M · 2017

Stages are modeled from round size (public records carry no series label). No record for: Seed — the company may have raised it under a different exemption, merged it into an adjacent record, or skipped it. Sequence completeness: 75%.

Modeled valuation trajectory
$90.3M
Base estimate est.
$7.3M
Conservative case
$347.5M
Upside case
$16.5M
Modeled post-money

Round size and date are reported; the stage label is inferred from round size (latest is Series Ba $15M–$40M round). Valuation is modeled from stage benchmarks scaled by the technology sector profile. Directional, not a quoted figure.

Pre-Seed · modeled $11.9M · 2010-11-232010Pre-Seed · modeled $11.9M · 2010-11-23Pre-Seed · modeled $11.9M · 2010-11-23Pre-Seed · modeled $11.9M · 2010-11-23Series A · modeled $212.7M · 2011-12-22Series A · modeled $3.9M · 2013-03-06Series A · modeled $83.2M · 2013-10-29Series B · modeled $457.8M · 2014-12-19Series A · modeled $416.1M · 2014-12-19Series B · modeled $91.4M · 2016-03-31Series B · modeled $90.3M · 2017-01-252017
Model inputs · modeled:benchmark-stage-stepup-v1
18%
Dilution assumption
Implied ownership sold in the financing.
67%
Survival probability
44% low · 81% high
1.42×/yr
Annual markup
1.72×/yr upside case
6.0 yr
Elapsed time used
9.4 yr actual, capped for stale marks
technology
Sector profile
Adjusts growth and survival by industry.
Financing rhythm
7 mo
Avg between rounds
$5.2M/yr
Capital velocity
15.6 yr
On record since
2010
First round
11
Rounds on file
How it compares to the market

Benchmarked against 3920 companies in Software / Tech. Each bar is a median (the middle company, not an average — outliers don't skew it). Two yardsticks: real money raised (reported on Form D) and modeled value (our estimate est.). These are whole-sector medians across all stages, except the per-stage row.

Total raised — vs sector median (real $, all stages) 7.0× above median
This company$32.1M
Sector median$4.6M
Latest round — vs other Series B rounds in sector (real $, this stage) 0.1× of median
This company$3.0M
Sector median$19.9M
Modeled value — vs sector median (estimate, all stages) 2.5× above median
This company$90.3M
Sector median$36.6M

Raised more than 86% of sector peers (real $). Modeled value above 69% of peers (estimate).

Niche peers — same stage & era

A tighter cohort than the sector chart above — only companies at the same stage (Series B) that last raised in the same ~3-year era, ranked by modeled value est. (not money raised). This is the exact set the analyst read compares against, so a like-for-like cohort is what makes "over/under-valued" meaningful. This company ranks #69 of 78.

This companyCohort peer
$10.0M$100.0M$1.0B$10.0B$10.0M$100.0MCapital raised (log)Orchid Labs Inc. · Series B Raised $40.6M · modeled $1.1B (est)Overclock Labs, Inc. · Series B Raised $35.3M · modeled $1.0B (est)Reflexis Systems Inc · Series B Raised $67.2M · modeled $999.8M (est)Nav Technologies, Inc. · Series B Raised $67.8M · modeled $995.5M (est)Vesper Technologies Inc. · Series B Raised $51.4M · modeled $971.7M (est)Applied Data Finance, LLC · Series B Raised $30.8M · modeled $938.7M (est)Digital Reasoning Systems, Inc. · Series B Raised $80.5M · modeled $913.8M (est)Singular Labs Inc. · Series B Raised $35.6M · modeled $913.7M (est)Skyport Systems, Inc. · Series B Raised $66.7M · modeled $904.5M (est)Constellation Labs, LLC · Series B Raised $29.7M · modeled $904.1M (est)Theta Labs, Inc. · Series B Raised $37.4M · modeled $887.6M (est)SolidEnergy Systems Corp. · Series B Raised $79.5M · modeled $879.4M (est)Nanocomp Technologies, Inc. (this company) Raised $32.1M · modeled $90.3M (est)Nanocomp Technologies, Inc.
CompanyStageRaised · realValue · estvs peer med.
Orchid Labs Inc.Series B$40.6M$1.1B1.89×
Overclock Labs, Inc.Series B$35.3M$1.0B1.78×
Reflexis Systems IncSeries B$67.2M$999.8M1.72×
Nav Technologies, Inc.Series B$67.8M$995.5M1.71×
Vesper Technologies Inc.Series B$51.4M$971.7M1.67×
Applied Data Finance, LLCSeries B$30.8M$938.7M1.61×
Digital Reasoning Systems, Inc.Series B$80.5M$913.8M1.57×
Singular Labs Inc.Series B$35.6M$913.7M1.57×
Skyport Systems, Inc.Series B$66.7M$904.5M1.55×
Constellation Labs, LLCSeries B$29.7M$904.1M1.55×
Theta Labs, Inc.Series B$37.4M$887.6M1.52×
SolidEnergy Systems Corp.Series B$79.5M$879.4M1.51×
Nanocomp Technologies, Inc. this companySeries B$32.1M$90.3M0.16×
Full financing history

Stage is inferred from round size est., not reported on the filing — a round's dollar size maps to a bucket: Pre-Seed <$1.0M · Seed $1.0M–$4.0M · Series A $4.0M–$15M · Series B $15M–$40M · Series C $40M–$100M · Series D+ $100M–$400M · Growth/Late >$400M.

StageAmount · realAnnouncedPost-money · estValue · estConf.
Pre-Seed$281K2010-11-23$1.6M$11.9M85%
Pre-Seed$281K2010-11-23$1.6M$11.9M85%
Pre-Seed$281K2010-11-23$1.6M$11.9M85%
Pre-Seed$281K2010-11-23$1.6M$11.9M85%
Series A$7.7M2011-12-22$34.9M$212.7M85%
Series A$140K2013-03-06$634K$3.9M85%
Series A$3.0M2013-10-29$13.6M$83.2M85%
Series B$15.0M2014-12-19$83.5M$457.8M85%
Series A$15.0M2014-12-19$68.2M$416.1M85%
Series B$3.0M2016-03-31$16.7M$91.4M85%
Series B$3.0M2017-01-25$16.5M$90.3M90%
What happened at each round

Step-up, pace versus the sector's normal cadence, and revenue/exemption moves — read straight from the reported round facts reported.

  1. Pre-Seed$281K2010-11-23
    • First recorded raise — entered as Pre-Seed.
    • 17 investors on this round.
  2. Pre-Seed$281K2010-11-23
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 17 investors on this round.
  3. Pre-Seed$281K2010-11-23
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 17 investors on this round.
  4. Pre-Seed$281K2010-11-23
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 17 investors on this round.
  5. Series A$7.7M2011-12-22
    • Raised 13 mo later, in step with the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 27.2× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 38 investors on this round.
  6. Series A$140K2013-03-06
    • Raised 14 mo later, in step with the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 55.0× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 6 investors on this round.
  7. Series A$3.0M2013-10-29
    • Raised 8 mo later, in step with the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 21.5× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Switched to Rule 506(b) (was Rule 06).
    • 3 investors on this round.
  8. Series B$15.0M2014-12-19
    • Raised 14 mo later, in step with the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 5.0× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 2 investors on this round.
  9. Series A$15.0M2014-12-19
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 1 investor on this round.
  10. Series B$3.0M2016-03-31
    • Raised 15 mo later, in step with the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 5.0× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 1 investor on this round.
  11. Series B$3.0M2017-01-25
    • Raised 10 mo later, in step with the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 6 investors on this round.
Intelligence
2017 ~Q3
Modeled next raise · ~7mo cadence
$3.0M
Modeled next size est.range $3.0M$4.7M
1.0×
Last step-up
$5.2M/yr
Capital velocity

Predictive signals are modeled est. from this company's own cadence and step-up, plus sector benchmarks — directional, not advice. Peer set and a CSV export live in your analyst workspace.

Key people & operators

Officers, directors and promoters named in this company's public recordsreported — the people who run it (not its investors). "Also runs" counts come from name-matching across all records, so verify before acting.

PersonRoleAlso runsTied since
Gerard Neumann5 other2016-03
Nathaniel Henshaw2 other2014-12
David Gruber1 other2010-11
James Barber1 other2014-12
Matthew Pierson1 other2010-11
Michael Gurau1 other2010-11
Paul Hallee1 other2016-03
David Lashmore2010-11
James Dean2016-03
Jerome Smith2016-03
John Gargasz2017-01
Peter Antoinette2010-11
Robert Dean, Jr.2013-03
Registry & provenance

Nanocomp Technologies, Inc. is an official record sourced from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). U.S. data is aggregated from SEC Form D filings.

United States
Country of record
US
Jurisdiction
1376375
SEC CIK
Similar companies

Nearest neighbours across the whole database — matched on sector, stage and capital scale, and on shared operators (officers or directors named at both companies in public filings). A discovery shortlist, not a valuation cohort — verify before acting, the same way modeled figures are directional.

CompanySectorStageRaised · realValue · estWhy similar
Stone Mountain Technologies, Inc.Software / TechSeries B$32.0M$99.1Msame sector · same stage
Vbrick Systems IncSoftware / TechSeries B$30.5M$73.5Msame sector · same stage
Oasis Labs, Inc.Software / TechSeries B$30.2M$91.4Msame sector · same stage
Abaxx Technologies Inc.Software / TechSeries B$34.7M$104.0Msame sector · same stage
Animal Microbiome Analytics, Inc.Software / TechSeries B$29.3M$109.7Msame sector · same stage
Mia Labs, Inc.Software / TechSeries B$29.0M$89.0Msame sector · same stage
Weather Analytics, LLCSoftware / TechSeries B$36.3M$107.9Msame sector · same stage
Spinal Stabilization Technologies, LLCSoftware / TechSeries B$38.6M$103.0Msame sector · same stage
Semantically similar

Matched by meaning, not labels — a local language model reads each company's name, sector and description and ranks the closest in that learned space. This catches look-alikes that cross sector boundaries; the structured list above explains its matches, this one trusts the text. Directional, like every modeled signal here.

CompanySectorStageValue · estMatch
Nano Labs LtdSoftware / TechSeries A$49.2M90%
Nano Net Technologies Inc.Software / TechSeries B$245.2M90%
NanoPattern Technologies, Inc.Software / TechSeed$3.9M90%
Nanotech Engineering Inc.Other TechnologySeed$125.5M88%
Nanotech, Inc.OtherSeries A$56.5M87%
Nano Carbon Solutions, Inc.Other TechnologyPre-Seed$3.0M87%
Nano-C IncOther TechnologySeries B$164.2M86%
NanotechGalaxy Inc.Other TechnologySeed$98.8M86%
Frequently asked
How much funding has Nanocomp Technologies, Inc. raised?
Nanocomp Technologies, Inc. has raised approximately $32.1M in disclosed capital across 7 recorded financing rounds, aggregated from public filings.
What is Nanocomp Technologies, Inc.'s estimated valuation?
Provath's modeled valuation for Nanocomp Technologies, Inc. is approximately $90.3M (modeled range $7.3M–$347.5M). This is an algorithmic estimate derived from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
What funding stage is Nanocomp Technologies, Inc. at?
Nanocomp Technologies, Inc.'s latest modeled financing stage is Series B. Its most recent recorded round closed around Wed Jan 25.
What does Nanocomp Technologies, Inc. do and where is it based?
Nanocomp Technologies, Inc. operates in the Software / Tech sector, based in MERRIMACK.
Explore related

See where Nanocomp Technologies, Inc. sits in the wider market — its sector, location and stage cohorts, each with their own leaderboards and capital-flow timelines.

Is this your company?

If you work at Nanocomp Technologies, Inc., claim this profile or suggest a correction. We aggregate from public filings, so help us keep your description, website and links accurate.

Is this your company? Update your profile or add contact details — and choose exactly who can reach you. Reviewed before anything is published.