Companies · Other Technology
WESTWOOD · Other Technology
Diligence memoA one-page analyst read on Nano-C Inc — recommendation, valuation, rhythm, risks.→Nano-C Inc looks over-valued against its niche peers and is active on financing cadence.
Synthesized from the figures below est. — every claim rests on a number shown on this page. Valuation uses the technology sector profile.
Analyst read est. — computed against this company's niche peers in the same era. Inputs shown; not a quoted figure.
No named principal in this company's public records yet — see all operators below.
Explore how these operators interlock with other companies in the operator network.
Nano-C Inc is one of 21292 Other Technology companies tracked from WESTWOOD. By capital raised it ranks among the largest (ahead of 95% of sector peers), and in the upper tier by modeled valuation est..
Ranking is computed against this company's own sector cohort — reported capital is fact; valuation tiers are modeled.
As reported in public records reported — not modeled.
Solid bars are reported offering amounts reported; hatched bars are the modeled post-money valuation est. — both on one shared scale so you can read raise-vs-worth at each round directly. Use the toggles to overlay data labels and the niche-peer / market average value lines.
The line shows cumulative reported funding over the period; + labels show new capital added between points when there is room. Toggle on-bar figures, plus the niche-peer and market averages, to read this company against its cohort. Benchmarks are modeled medians.
Stages are modeled from round size (public records carry no series label). No record for: Pre-Seed — the company may have raised it under a different exemption, merged it into an adjacent record, or skipped it. Sequence completeness: 75%.
Round size and date are reported; the stage label is inferred from round size (latest is Series B — a $15M–$40M round). Valuation is modeled from stage benchmarks scaled by the technology sector profile. Directional, not a quoted figure.
Benchmarked against 21292 companies in Other Technology. Each bar is a median (the middle company, not an average — outliers don't skew it). Two yardsticks: real money raised (reported on Form D) and modeled value (our estimate est.). These are whole-sector medians across all stages, except the per-stage row.
Raised more than 95% of sector peers (real $). Modeled value above 81% of peers (estimate).
A tighter cohort than the sector chart above — only companies at the same stage (Series B) that last raised in the same ~3-year era, ranked by modeled value est. (not money raised). This is the exact set the analyst read compares against, so a like-for-like cohort is what makes "over/under-valued" meaningful. This company ranks #23 of 193.
| Company | Stage | Raised · real | Value · est | vs peer med. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proscia Inc. | Series B | $113.9M | $206.4M | 2.03× |
| Creditly Corp. | Series B | $53.0M | $206.1M | 2.02× |
| Enbalg Group Corp | Series B | $51.0M | $205.5M | 2.02× |
| Lumana Inc. | Series B | $37.0M | $202.8M | 1.99× |
| ProrataAI, Inc. | Series B | $70.9M | $201.6M | 1.98× |
| Augmodo Inc. | Series B | $37.6M | $197.7M | 1.94× |
| Altera.AL, Inc. | Series B | $40.1M | $190.3M | 1.87× |
| Optimal Dynamics, Inc. | Series B | $88.0M | $188.5M | 1.85× |
| Agentio Inc. | Series B | $58.2M | $187.4M | 1.84× |
| Urban Sky Theory, Inc. | Series B | $45.0M | $186.3M | 1.83× |
| Mombak Holdings Ltd. | Series B | $61.5M | $185.4M | 1.82× |
| Numeral Two Inc. | Series B | $53.1M | $184.5M | 1.81× |
| Nano-C Inc this company | Series B | $71.0M | $164.2M | 1.61× |
Stage is inferred from round size est., not reported on the filing — a round's dollar size maps to a bucket: Pre-Seed <$1.0M · Seed $1.0M–$4.0M · Series A $4.0M–$15M · Series B $15M–$40M · Series C $40M–$100M · Series D+ $100M–$400M · Growth/Late >$400M.
| Stage | Amount · real | Announced | Post-money · est | Value · est | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Series A | $11.5M | 2018-04-02 | $52.3M | $319.0M | 90% |
| Series A | $4.8M | 2018-07-17 | $21.6M | $132.0M | 90% |
| Seed | $1.1M | 2018-07-17 | $5.5M | $37.5M | 90% |
| Series A | $9.8M | 2018-07-17 | $44.4M | $271.0M | 90% |
| Seed | $2.7M | 2018-07-17 | $13.5M | $92.0M | 90% |
| Seed | $1.3M | 2020-02-28 | $6.3M | $42.6M | 90% |
| Series A | $5.1M | 2020-02-28 | $23.0M | $140.2M | 90% |
| Series A | $8.5M | 2021-07-01 | $38.7M | $157.6M | 90% |
| Series A | $660K | 2022-04-26 | $3.0M | $8.8M | 90% |
| Series A | $1.0M | 2022-08-03 | $4.6M | $12.1M | 90% |
| Series A | $2.0M | 2023-10-30 | $9.1M | $14.4M | 90% |
| Series B | $32.5M | 2025-08-12 | $180.6M | $164.2M | 90% |
Step-up, pace versus the sector's normal cadence, and revenue/exemption moves — read straight from the reported round facts reported.
Predictive signals are modeled est. from this company's own cadence and step-up, plus sector benchmarks — directional, not advice. Peer set and a CSV export live in your analyst workspace.
Officers, directors and promoters named in this company's public recordsreported — the people who run it (not its investors). "Also runs" counts come from name-matching across all records, so verify before acting.
| Person | Role | Also runs | Tied since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peter De Roetth | — | 1 other | 2018-04 |
| Raymond S. Stata | — | 1 other | 2020-02 |
| Christopher F. Cheever | — | — | 2018-04 |
| Christopher R. Cheever | — | — | 2021-07 |
| Christopher S. Cheever | — | — | 2020-02 |
| Donald S. Wallroth | — | — | 2025-08 |
| John F. Cogan, Jr. | — | — | 2018-04 |
| John F. Grover | — | — | 2018-04 |
| John R. Grover | — | — | 2021-07 |
| John S. Grover | — | — | 2020-02 |
| Peter R. De Roetth | — | — | 2018-07 |
| Sandeep S. Singh | — | — | 2025-08 |
| Stanley S. Twarog | — | — | 2025-08 |
| Viktor R. Vegins | — | — | 2022-08 |
| Viktor R. Vejins | — | — | 2018-07 |
| Viktor Vejins | — | — | 2018-04 |
Nano-C Inc is an official record sourced from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). U.S. data is aggregated from SEC Form D filings.
Nearest neighbours across the whole database — matched on sector, stage and capital scale, and on shared operators (officers or directors named at both companies in public filings). A discovery shortlist, not a valuation cohort — verify before acting, the same way modeled figures are directional.
| Company | Sector | Stage | Raised · real | Value · est | Why similar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kalderos, Inc. | Other Technology | Series B | $76.3M | $166.9M | same sector · same stage |
| Lirio, LLC | Other Technology | Series B | $76.6M | $161.6M | same sector · same stage |
| Appcelerator, Inc. | Other Technology | Series B | $79.3M | $173.6M | same sector · same stage |
| Rembrand, Inc | Other Technology | Series B | $61.2M | $171.9M | same sector · same stage |
| DNSFilter, Inc. | Other Technology | Series B | $60.8M | $153.6M | same sector · same stage |
| Osaro, Inc. | Other Technology | Series B | $57.8M | $164.0M | same sector · same stage |
| Posh Group Inc. | Other Technology | Series B | $57.8M | $159.8M | same sector · same stage |
| RedShelf, Inc. | Other Technology | Series B | $55.6M | $162.8M | same sector · same stage |
Matched by meaning, not labels — a local language model reads each company's name, sector and description and ranks the closest in that learned space. This catches look-alikes that cross sector boundaries; the structured list above explains its matches, this one trusts the text. Directional, like every modeled signal here.
| Company | Sector | Stage | Value · est | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Carbon Solutions, Inc. | Other Technology | Pre-Seed | $3.0M | 95% |
| Nanotech Engineering Inc. | Other Technology | Seed | $125.5M | 93% |
| C3 Nano, Inc. | Other Technology | Series A | $155.6M | 92% |
| Nano One Materials Corp. | Other Technology | Seed | $60.0M | 92% |
| Nanofactory Corp | Other Technology | Seed | $69.2M | 91% |
| NanoMech, Inc. | Other Technology | Series A | $41.2M | 91% |
| Ts-Nano, Inc. | Other Technology | Pre-Seed | $4.2M | 91% |
| Nanoscale Components, Inc. | Other Technology | Series A | $249.6M | 91% |
See where Nano-C Inc sits in the wider market — its sector, location and stage cohorts, each with their own leaderboards and capital-flow timelines.
If you work at Nano-C Inc, claim this profile or suggest a correction. We aggregate from public filings, so help us keep your description, website and links accurate.
Is this your company? Update your profile or add contact details — and choose exactly who can reach you. Reviewed before anything is published.