Companies · Software / Tech
Santa Clara · Software / Tech · refined from filed group “Other Technology”
Diligence memoA one-page analyst read on Mapr Technologies, Inc. — recommendation, valuation, rhythm, risks.→Mapr Technologies, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Synthesized from the figures below est. — every claim rests on a number shown on this page. Valuation uses the technology sector profile.
Analyst read est. — computed against this company's niche peers in the same era. Inputs shown; not a quoted figure.
No named principal in this company's public records yet — see all operators below.
Explore how these operators interlock with other companies in the operator network.
Mapr Technologies, Inc. is one of 3920 Software / Tech companies tracked from Santa Clara. By capital raised it ranks among the largest (ahead of 99% of sector peers), and among the largest by modeled valuation est..
Ranking is computed against this company's own sector cohort — reported capital is fact; valuation tiers are modeled.
As reported in public records reported — not modeled.
Solid bars are reported offering amounts reported; hatched bars are the modeled post-money valuation est. — both on one shared scale so you can read raise-vs-worth at each round directly. Use the toggles to overlay data labels and the niche-peer / market average value lines.
The line shows cumulative reported funding over the period; + labels show new capital added between points when there is room. Toggle on-bar figures, plus the niche-peer and market averages, to read this company against its cohort. Benchmarks are modeled medians.
Stages are modeled from round size (public records carry no series label). No record for: Pre-Seed, Seed — the company may have raised it under a different exemption, merged it into an adjacent record, or skipped it. Sequence completeness: 67%.
Round size and date are reported; the stage label is inferred from round size (latest is Series D+ — a $100M–$400M round). Valuation is modeled from stage benchmarks scaled by the technology sector profile. Directional, not a quoted figure.
Benchmarked against 3920 companies in Software / Tech. Each bar is a median (the middle company, not an average — outliers don't skew it). Two yardsticks: real money raised (reported on Form D) and modeled value (our estimate est.). These are whole-sector medians across all stages, except the per-stage row.
Raised more than 99% of sector peers (real $). Modeled value above 99% of peers (estimate).
A tighter cohort than the sector chart above — only companies at the same stage (Series D+) that last raised in the same ~3-year era, ranked by modeled value est. (not money raised). This is the exact set the analyst read compares against, so a like-for-like cohort is what makes "over/under-valued" meaningful. This company ranks #4 of 7.
| Company | Stage | Raised · real | Value · est | vs peer med. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optherium Labs OU | Series D+ | $234.0M | $7.4B | 1.53× |
| DAG Technologies, Inc. | Series D+ | $210.0M | $6.6B | 1.37× |
| Potato Data Inc | Series D+ | $200.0M | $6.3B | 1.31× |
| Mapr Technologies, Inc. this company | Series D+ | $347.5M | $4.8B | 1.00× |
| Intangible Labs, Inc. | Series D+ | $125.0M | $4.0B | 0.82× |
| Tangent Technologies Investments, LLC | Series D+ | $103.5M | $3.3B | 0.68× |
| Looker Data Sciences, Inc. | Series D+ | $232.4M | $3.3B | 0.67× |
Stage is inferred from round size est., not reported on the filing — a round's dollar size maps to a bucket: Pre-Seed <$1.0M · Seed $1.0M–$4.0M · Series A $4.0M–$15M · Series B $15M–$40M · Series C $40M–$100M · Series D+ $100M–$400M · Growth/Late >$400M.
| Stage | Amount · real | Announced | Post-money · est | Value · est | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Series A | $9.0M | 2009-07-10 | $40.9M | $249.7M | 85% |
| Series B | $20.0M | 2011-08-24 | $111.4M | $610.6M | 85% |
| Series B | $35.0M | 2013-03-04 | $194.4M | $1.1B | 85% |
| Series B | $30.0M | 2013-03-04 | $166.7M | $913.7M | 85% |
| Series D+ | $320.0M | 2013-03-04 | $2.7B | $10.1B | 85% |
| Series B | $32.0M | 2013-03-04 | $177.8M | $974.6M | 85% |
| Series B | $30.0M | 2013-03-04 | $166.7M | $913.7M | 85% |
| Series C | $80.0M | 2014-06-25 | $533.3M | $2.5B | 85% |
| Series C | $50.5M | 2016-07-27 | $336.8M | $1.6B | 85% |
| Series D+ | $152.9M | 2017-08-21 | $1.3B | $4.8B | 90% |
| Series C | $46.1M | 2017-08-21 | $307.6M | $1.5B | 90% |
| Series C | $61.0M | 2017-08-21 | $406.5M | $1.9B | 90% |
Step-up, pace versus the sector's normal cadence, and revenue/exemption moves — read straight from the reported round facts reported.
Predictive signals are modeled est. from this company's own cadence and step-up, plus sector benchmarks — directional, not advice. Peer set and a CSV export live in your analyst workspace.
Officers, directors and promoters named in this company's public recordsreported — the people who run it (not its investors). "Also runs" counts come from name-matching across all records, so verify before acting.
| Person | Role | Also runs | Tied since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Sonsini | — | 17 other | 2009-07 |
| Barry Eggers | — | 8 other | 2009-07 |
| MATTHEW MILLS | — | 4 other | 2017-08 |
| Gene Frantz | — | 2 other | 2017-08 |
| George Roberts | — | 2 other | 2017-08 |
| Barry C. Eggers | — | 1 other | 2011-08 |
| Eugene Frantz | — | 1 other | 2017-08 |
| John Schroeder | — | 1 other | 2017-08 |
| Michael C. Lehman | — | 1 other | 2014-06 |
| Michael Lehman | — | 1 other | 2017-08 |
| PETER C SONSINI | — | 1 other | 2011-08 |
| Roger Siboni | — | 1 other | 2017-08 |
| BARRY K. EGGERS | — | — | 2016-07 |
| Dan Atler | — | — | 2017-08 |
| Dan C. Atler | — | — | 2014-06 |
| Daniel Atler | — | — | 2017-08 |
| DANIEL K. ATLER | — | — | 2016-07 |
| Eugene C. Frantz | — | — | 2014-06 |
| EUGENE K. FRANTZ | — | — | 2016-07 |
| John W. Schroeder | — | — | 2009-07 |
| Mandayam C. Srivas | — | — | 2009-07 |
| MATTHEW W. MILLS | — | — | 2016-07 |
| MICHAEL K. LEHMAN | — | — | 2016-07 |
| Mike Lehman | — | — | 2017-08 |
Mapr Technologies, Inc. is an official record sourced from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). U.S. data is aggregated from SEC Form D filings.
Nearest neighbours across the whole database — matched on sector, stage and capital scale, and on shared operators (officers or directors named at both companies in public filings). A discovery shortlist, not a valuation cohort — verify before acting, the same way modeled figures are directional.
| Company | Sector | Stage | Raised · real | Value · est | Why similar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fever Labs, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series D+ | $347.2M | $1.1B | same sector · same stage |
| Sentinel Labs, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series D+ | $345.5M | $2.8B | same sector · same stage |
| Hippo Analytics Inc. | Software / Tech | Series D+ | $344.2M | $4.7B | same sector · same stage |
| Altana Technologies, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series D+ | $344.1M | $2.5B | same sector · same stage |
| PureCycle Technologies, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series D+ | $340.0M | $983.7M | same sector · same stage |
| JenaValve Technology Inc | Software / Tech | Series D+ | $328.5M | $2.2B | same sector · same stage |
| Notion Labs, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series D+ | $327.0M | $6.0B | same sector · same stage |
| Astranis Space Technologies Corp. | Software / Tech | Series D+ | $376.3M | $7.4B | same sector · same stage |
Matched by meaning, not labels — a local language model reads each company's name, sector and description and ranks the closest in that learned space. This catches look-alikes that cross sector boundaries; the structured list above explains its matches, this one trusts the text. Directional, like every modeled signal here.
| Company | Sector | Stage | Value · est | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADAR Technologies, Inc. | Software / Tech | Pre-Seed | $222K | 86% |
| Pager Technologies, Inc | Software / Tech | Series A | $77.7M | 86% |
| Coder Technologies, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series B | $264.2M | 86% |
| Dor Technologies, Inc. | Software / Tech | Seed | $110.7M | 85% |
| Leadr Technologies, Inc | Software / Tech | Series A | $61.1M | 85% |
| Aker Technologies Inc. | Software / Tech | Seed | $36.0M | 84% |
| Postr Technologies, Inc. | Software / Tech | Seed | $4.6M | 84% |
| Intermap Technologies Corp | Software / Tech | Series A | $3.3M | 84% |
See where Mapr Technologies, Inc. sits in the wider market — its sector, location and stage cohorts, each with their own leaderboards and capital-flow timelines.
If you work at Mapr Technologies, Inc., claim this profile or suggest a correction. We aggregate from public filings, so help us keep your description, website and links accurate.
Is this your company? Update your profile or add contact details — and choose exactly who can reach you. Reviewed before anything is published.