Connecticut On-Line Computer Center Inc☆Watch⊞Compare

Analyst read est. — computed against this company's niche peers in the same era. Inputs shown; not a quoted figure.

Procedural diagnosis est. — rule-based common-sense checks over the filing pattern, issuer name, activity cadence, and surfaced operating evidence.

Connecticut On-Line Computer Center Inc behaves more like a recurring private-offering issuer than a conventional venture-backed operating company.

No named principal in this company's public records yet — see all operators below.

Explore how these operators interlock with other companies in the operator network.

Connecticut On-Line Computer Center Inc is one of 3920 Software / Tech companies tracked from SOUTHINGTON. By capital raised it ranks among the largest (ahead of 97% of sector peers), and in the upper tier by modeled valuation est..

Ranking is computed against this company's own sector cohort — reported capital is fact; valuation tiers are modeled.

As reported in public records reported — not modeled.

This issuer has a dense recurring filing history, so the chart groups filings by year. Solid bars are annual reported capital reported; hatched bars show the latest modeled value est. observed in that year. Use the toggles to overlay data labels and the niche-peer / market average value lines.

This looks like a recurring offering series, so a VC stage ladder would be misleading. Showing the filed offering sequence instead.

This issuer files recurring offerings, so the model treats stage labels as a loose sizing heuristic, not a clean VC ladder. The estimate anchors on reported filing amounts and dates, then applies benchmark dilution, survival, and markup assumptions. Directional, not a quoted figure.

Benchmarked against 3920 companies in Software / Tech. Each bar is a median (the middle company, not an average — outliers don't skew it). Two yardsticks: real money raised (reported on Form D) and modeled value (our estimate est.). These are whole-sector medians across all stages, except the per-stage row.

Raised more than 97% of sector peers (real $). Modeled value above 86% of peers (estimate).

This issuer files too frequently for VC stage labels to be meaningful, so rows are shown as initial/follow-on offerings est. instead of Pre-Seed/Seed/Series buckets.

Step-up, pace versus the sector's normal cadence, and revenue/exemption moves — read straight from the reported round facts reported.

1. Initial offering$13.5M2010-04-28
   • First recorded raise — entered as Initial offering.
   • 81 investors on this round.
2. Follow-on offering$7.7M2010-04-28
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 1.7× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
   • 69 investors on this round.
3. Follow-on offering$3.3M2010-04-28
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 2.3× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
   • 39 investors on this round.
4. Follow-on offering$13.9M2010-04-28
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 4.2× larger than the prior — scaling up.
   • 84 investors on this round.
5. Follow-on offering$5.3M2010-04-28
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 2.6× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
   • 53 investors on this round.
6. Follow-on offering$11.7M2010-04-28
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 2.2× larger than the prior — scaling up.
   • 79 investors on this round.
7. Follow-on offering$2.2M2010-04-28
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 5.3× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
   • Switched to Rule 06 (was Rule 506(b)).
   • 28 investors on this round.
8. Follow-on offering$1.6M2010-04-28
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 1.4× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
   • 21 investors on this round.
9. Follow-on offering$9.6M2010-04-28
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 6.0× larger than the prior — scaling up.
   • Switched to Rule 506(b) (was Rule 06).
   • 71 investors on this round.
10. Follow-on offering$11.5M2010-04-28
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 140 investors on this round.
11. Follow-on offering$7.3M2010-04-28
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.6× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 70 investors on this round.
12. Follow-on offering$1.1M2010-04-28
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 6.7× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • Switched to Rule 06 (was Rule 506(b)).
    • 13 investors on this round.
13. Follow-on offering$6.5M2010-04-28
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 6.0× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Switched to Rule 506(b) (was Rule 06).
    • 62 investors on this round.
14. Follow-on offering$7.5M2014-06-17
    • Raised again after 50 mo — slower than the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 72 investors on this round.
15. Follow-on offering$9.8M2014-06-17
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.3× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 85 investors on this round.
16. Follow-on offering$6.9M2014-06-17
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.4× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 65 investors on this round.
17. Follow-on offering$7.7M2014-06-17
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 72 investors on this round.
18. Follow-on offering$6.6M2014-06-17
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 74 investors on this round.
19. Follow-on offering$9.2M2014-06-17
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.4× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 79 investors on this round.
20. Follow-on offering$1.6M2014-06-17
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 5.9× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 17 investors on this round.
21. Follow-on offering$7.4M2014-06-17
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 4.8× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 71 investors on this round.
22. Follow-on offering$10.2M2014-06-17
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.4× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 88 investors on this round.
23. Follow-on offering$9.2M2014-06-17
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 83 investors on this round.

Predictive signals are modeled est. from this company's own cadence and step-up, plus sector benchmarks — directional, not advice. Peer set and a CSV export live in your analyst workspace.

Officers, directors and promoters named in this company's public recordsreported — the people who run it (not its investors). "Also runs" counts come from name-matching across all records, so verify before acting.

Connecticut On-Line Computer Center Inc is an official record sourced from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). U.S. data is aggregated from SEC Form D filings.

Nearest neighbours across the whole database — matched on sector, stage and capital scale, and on shared operators (officers or directors named at both companies in public filings). A discovery shortlist, not a valuation cohort — verify before acting, the same way modeled figures are directional.

Matched by meaning, not labels — a local language model reads each company's name, sector and description and ranks the closest in that learned space. This catches look-alikes that cross sector boundaries; the structured list above explains its matches, this one trusts the text. Directional, like every modeled signal here.

See where Connecticut On-Line Computer Center Inc sits in the wider market — its sector, location and stage cohorts, each with their own leaderboards and capital-flow timelines.

If you work at Connecticut On-Line Computer Center Inc, claim this profile or suggest a correction. We aggregate from public filings, so help us keep your description, website and links accurate.