Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Zero E Technologies, LLC

Zero E Technologies, LLC looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Zero E Technologies, LLC operates in Other, based in WHEAT RIDGE.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Zero E Technologies, LLC has raised $4.4M in disclosed capital across 6 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $1.3M on 2010-07-07.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2013-09-04.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Zero E Technologies, LLC at approximately $9.9M (range $477K–$77M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.30× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (998 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 7 months.

Last raise 12.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.1× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 63% of Other peers (25008 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 38% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: 76826776, Llc, DeepWater Desal, LLC, Idibon, Inc., 76826778, Llc, Ttri, Llc.

Peoplefiled

9 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.