Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

ZEEP Inc

ZEEP Inc looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

ZEEP Inc operates in Other Energy, based in AUSTIN.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

ZEEP Inc has raised $15M in disclosed capital across 9 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $4.0M on 2008-10-22.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2018-03-28.

Filings read as a recurring offering program rather than a clean venture-stage ladder — interpret stage labels and step-ups with that in mind.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models ZEEP Inc at approximately $39M (range $2.6M–$306M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.51× the median modeled value of Seed Other Energy companies in 2016–2018 (88 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 3 months.

Last raise 8.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 12 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.0× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 77% of Other Energy peers (2049 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 67% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: RigNet, Inc., Phoenix Services Topco, LLC, MT CB VS Long Beach Solar One, LLC, Lakeview Biodiesel LLC, Carbon Engineering Limited Partnership.

Peoplefiled

24 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.

Recurring-offering pattern: stage-based valuation has lower applicability.