Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

XY Sense, Inc.

XY Sense, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

XY Sense, Inc. operates in Other, based in VICTORIA.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

XY Sense, Inc. has raised $11M in disclosed capital across 3 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $6.3M on 2021-03-25.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2022-05-27.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models XY Sense, Inc. at approximately $27M (range $4.3M–$94M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.69× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2022–2024 (1135 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (69% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 30 months.

Last raise 4.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 2.0× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 79% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 60% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Ness Well, Inc., Quantori, Inc., Qquv Investments 5, Llc, Applause Network TV, Inc., Trustworthy Co.

Peoplefiled

3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.