Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

WorldViz, Inc.

WorldViz, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

WorldViz, Inc. operates in Other, based in SANTA BARBARA.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

WorldViz, Inc. has raised $5.1M in disclosed capital across 5 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $2.5M on 2015-02-27.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2018-02-14.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models WorldViz, Inc. at approximately $2.2M (range $108K–$18M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.06× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2016–2018 (1003 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 5 months.

Last raise 8.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 8.3× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 67% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 12% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Zooba Eats, Inc., EQX Capital, Inc., Alliance Time Holdings, LLC, Springfield Hockey, LLC, Spring Hill Development Partners, LLC.

Peoplefiled

9 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.