Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

WorkerSense, Inc.

WorkerSense, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

WorkerSense, Inc. operates in Other, based in LOS ANGELES.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

WorkerSense, Inc. has raised $350K in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $250K on 2021-10-05.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2021-10-05.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models WorkerSense, Inc. at approximately $3.3M (range $167K–$26M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.54× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2019–2021 (1372 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 23 months.

Last raise 4.7 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 2.5× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 18% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 18% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Valued, Inc., CiiTA, LLC, Wnder, LTD, Supernova Discotheque, LLC, TommyKnockers LLC.

Peoplefiled

1 named person on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.