Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Whiteglove House Call Health Inc

Whiteglove House Call Health Inc looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Whiteglove House Call Health Inc operates in Hospitals and Physicians, based in Austin.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Whiteglove House Call Health Inc has raised $65M in disclosed capital across 13 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series B (a $15M–$40M round).

Largest single filing: $15M on 2014-06-13.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2016-08-02.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Whiteglove House Call Health Inc at approximately $31M (range $3.7M–$119M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.18× the median modeled value of Series B Hospitals and Physicians companies in 2016–2018 (7 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 8 months.

Last raise 9.9 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 12 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 10.1× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 94% of Hospitals and Physicians peers (599 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 61% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Hospitalists Now, Inc., Adeptus Health Inc., United ASC Holding Company, LLC, AbleTo, Inc., Bay Area Accountable Care Network, Inc..

Peoplefiled

24 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.