Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

WC SACD Holdings, Inc.

WC SACD Holdings, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is active on financing cadence.

Diligence furtherNo decisive signal either way from the public record alone — the call needs primary diligence beyond the filings.

Businessfiled

WC SACD Holdings, Inc. operates in Other, based in BOSTON.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

WC SACD Holdings, Inc. has raised $624M in disclosed capital across 4 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series D+ (a $100M–$400M round).

Largest single filing: $274M on 2020-06-30.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2025-12-11.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models WC SACD Holdings, Inc. at approximately $1.2B (range $850M–$1.4B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.21× the median modeled value of Series D+ Other companies in 2025–2027 (50 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (121% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 28 months.

Last raise 7 mo ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Raising on or ahead of the sector's normal rhythm.

The last round was 1.8× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 100% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 97% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: AP Adhesives Acquisitions, Inc., INNOVATE Corp., Curaleaf Holdings, Inc., Phantom Parent, LP, Impulse Space, Inc..

Peoplefiled

18 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.