Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Waterloo Swimming, LP

Waterloo Swimming, LP looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Waterloo Swimming, LP operates in Other, based in AUSTIN.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Waterloo Swimming, LP has raised $1.2M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $1.2M on 2014-12-02.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-12-02.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Waterloo Swimming, LP at approximately $22M (range $1.1M–$171M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.67× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (998 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (67% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 11.6 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 40% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 55% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Bodri Capital Management, LLC, as Trustee under that certain Declaration of Trust dated December 17, 2015, 76826774, Llc, 76826773, Llc, 76826772, Llc, EW Investor, LLC.

Peoplefiled

2 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.