Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026
United Sacrament Mobile Int. Inc.
United Sacrament Mobile Int. Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is active on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
United Sacrament Mobile Int. Inc. operates in Other, based in MIAMI. One Faith. One Fellowship. One Sacrament. A sacred community united in Spirit, nourished through Sacrament, and called to divine purpose. Get Started Login About Us Our Story United Sacrament Church (a DBA of United Sacrament Organization Corp and United Sacrament Ministries Church) was born from a
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
United Sacrament Mobile Int. Inc. has raised $1.0B in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Growth/Late (a round over $400M).
Largest single filing: $1.0B on 2026-03-24.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2026-03-24.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models United Sacrament Mobile Int. Inc. at approximately $9.3B (range $7.8B–$10.2B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 2.05× the median modeled value of Growth/Late Other companies in 2025–2027 (16 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Last raise 3 mo ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Raising on or ahead of the sector's normal rhythm.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 100% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 100% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Einstein Topco, L.P., Einstein Aggregator, L.P., AE EventsCo Holdings LLC, Apostolic Church of God-Childersburg, Gi Alliance Holdings, Llc.
Peoplefiled
2 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.