Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

UFG 1, LP, a California limited partnership

UFG 1, LP, a California limited partnership looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

UFG 1, LP, a California limited partnership operates in Other, based in SAN DIEGO.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

UFG 1, LP, a California limited partnership has raised $245K in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $245K on 2014-03-10.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-03-10.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models UFG 1, LP, a California limited partnership at approximately $5.7M (range $163K–$64M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.70× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (1650 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (70% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 12.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 11% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 27% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Waterblue IV LLC, Fairway America Fund VI, LLC, LoanTek, Inc., Roosevelt Way Investment, L.P., West Coast Customs Inc.

Peoplefiled

5 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.