Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
U S Precious Metals Inc
U S Precious Metals Inc looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
U S Precious Metals Inc operates in Other, based in Califon.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
U S Precious Metals Inc has raised $9.2M in disclosed capital across 20 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).
Largest single filing: $1.4M on 2015-02-25.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2015-02-25.
Filings read as a recurring offering program rather than a clean venture-stage ladder — interpret stage labels and step-ups with that in mind.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models U S Precious Metals Inc at approximately $26M (range $1.2M–$201M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.79× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (998 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (79% of peer median) for its niche.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 4 months.
Last raise 11.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
The last round stepped up 4.6× from the prior — scaling.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 76% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 60% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Bodri Capital Management, LLC, as Trustee under that certain Declaration of Trust dated December 17, 2015, 76826774, Llc, 76826773, Llc, 76826772, Llc, EW Investor, LLC.
Peoplefiled
22 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.
Recurring-offering pattern: stage-based valuation has lower applicability.