Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Tykes, Inc.

Tykes, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Tykes, Inc. operates in Other, based in CONCORD.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Tykes, Inc. has raised $574K in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $324K on 2014-07-30.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-07-30.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Tykes, Inc. at approximately $7.5M (range $216K–$85M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.92× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (1650 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (92% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 535 months.

Last raise 11.9 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.3× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 27% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 33% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Waterblue IV LLC, Fairway America Fund VI, LLC, LoanTek, Inc., Roosevelt Way Investment, L.P., West Coast Customs Inc.

Peoplefiled

2 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.