Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
Tucker Auto-Mation Holdings Usa, Llc
Tucker Auto-Mation Holdings Usa, Llc looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
Tucker Auto-Mation Holdings Usa, Llc operates in Other, based in NORTH VERSAILLES.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
Tucker Auto-Mation Holdings Usa, Llc has raised $4.2M in disclosed capital across 4 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).
Largest single filing: $1.9M on 2015-05-26.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2015-05-26.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models Tucker Auto-Mation Holdings Usa, Llc at approximately $35M (range $1.7M–$277M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.08× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (998 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (108% of peer median) for its niche.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 182 months.
Last raise 11.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
The last round stepped up 7.6× from the prior — scaling.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 63% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 65% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Bodri Capital Management, LLC, as Trustee under that certain Declaration of Trust dated December 17, 2015, 76826774, Llc, 76826773, Llc, 76826772, Llc, EW Investor, LLC.
Peoplefiled
5 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.