Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

TribeVR Inc

TribeVR Inc looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

TribeVR Inc operates in Other, based in SAN FRANCISCO.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

TribeVR Inc has raised $37M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series B (a $15M–$40M round).

Largest single filing: $27M on 2022-03-11.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2022-03-11.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models TribeVR Inc at approximately $301M (range $69M–$838M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.91× the median modeled value of Series B Other companies in 2022–2024 (465 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 4 months.

Last raise 4.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 2.7× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 91% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 91% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Ever/Body, Inc., Financeware Holdings LLC, American Cricket Enterprises Inc., Xlerate Ultimate Holdings, Lp, MDME Ultimate Holdings, LP.

Peoplefiled

3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.