Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Tremor Media Inc

Tremor Media Inc looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Tremor Media Inc operates in Other, based in NEW YORK.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Tremor Media Inc has raised $166M in disclosed capital across 5 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series C (a $40M–$100M round).

Largest single filing: $65M on 2010-12-09.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2011-09-06.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Tremor Media Inc at approximately $634M (range $143M–$1.7B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.70× the median modeled value of Series C Other companies in 2010–2012 (152 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (70% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 8 months.

Last raise 14.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 10.2× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 98% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 95% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: China XD Plastics Co Ltd, TPG-Axon Cube Trust, TPG-Axon Cube Sa rl, Ralco Holdings, Inc., 1-800-Pack-Rat, LLC.

Peoplefiled

15 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.