Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

TOP LEVEL DOMAIN HOLDINGS Ltd

TOP LEVEL DOMAIN HOLDINGS Ltd looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

TOP LEVEL DOMAIN HOLDINGS Ltd operates in Other, based in LONDON.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

TOP LEVEL DOMAIN HOLDINGS Ltd has raised $14M in disclosed capital across 3 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $8.7M on 2013-05-31.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2013-05-31.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models TOP LEVEL DOMAIN HOLDINGS Ltd at approximately $131M (range $12M–$712M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.48× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2013–2015 (623 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (148% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 23 months.

Last raise 13.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 6.3× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 81% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 85% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Biloxi Baseball, LLC, United Sample Inc, Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc., County Waste of Virginia, LLC, Marathon Patent Group, Inc..

Peoplefiled

15 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.