Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

TireVan Corp

TireVan Corp looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

TireVan Corp operates in Other, based in STERLING.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

TireVan Corp has raised $13M in disclosed capital across 5 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $3.2M on 2011-04-12.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2013-01-04.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models TireVan Corp at approximately $52M (range $2.5M–$409M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.60× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (998 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 13 months.

Last raise 13.5 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.0× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 80% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 72% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Bodri Capital Management, LLC, as Trustee under that certain Declaration of Trust dated December 17, 2015, 76826774, Llc, 76826773, Llc, 76826772, Llc, EW Investor, LLC.

Peoplefiled

14 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.