Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Thwapr, Inc.

Thwapr, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Thwapr, Inc. operates in Other, based in NEW YORK.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Thwapr, Inc. has raised $16M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series B (a $15M–$40M round).

Largest single filing: $15M on 2010-03-29.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2010-04-28.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Thwapr, Inc. at approximately $5.0M (range $750K–$19M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.01× the median modeled value of Series B Other companies in 2010–2012 (251 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 1 months.

Last raise 16.2 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 51.6× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 83% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 25% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: ATS Consolidated, Inc., Amber Holding Inc., Varsity AP Holdings LLC, Nordic Cold Storage Holdings, LLC, Nevsun Resources Ltd.

Peoplefiled

3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.