Companies · Other Technology
NEW YORK · Other Technology
Diligence memoA one-page analyst read on T-Rex Group, Inc. — recommendation, valuation, rhythm, risks.→T-Rex Group, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is at-risk on financing cadence.
Synthesized from the figures below est. — every claim rests on a number shown on this page. Valuation uses the technology sector profile.
Analyst read est. — computed against this company's niche peers in the same era. Inputs shown; not a quoted figure.
No named principal in this company's public records yet — see all operators below.
Explore how these operators interlock with other companies in the operator network.
T-Rex Group, Inc. is one of 21302 Other Technology companies tracked from NEW YORK. By capital raised it ranks among the largest (ahead of 95% of sector peers), and in the upper tier by modeled valuation est..
Ranking is computed against this company's own sector cohort — reported capital is fact; valuation tiers are modeled.
As reported in public records reported — not modeled.
Solid bars are reported offering amounts reported; hatched bars are the modeled post-money valuation est. — both on one shared scale so you can read raise-vs-worth at each round directly. Use the toggles to overlay data labels and the niche-peer / market average value lines.
The line shows cumulative reported funding over the period; + labels show new capital added between points when there is room. Toggle on-bar figures, plus the niche-peer and market averages, to read this company against its cohort. Benchmarks are modeled medians.
Stages are modeled from round size (public records carry no series label). No record for: Pre-Seed — the company may have raised it under a different exemption, merged it into an adjacent record, or skipped it. Sequence completeness: 75%.
Round size and date are reported; the stage label is inferred from round size (latest is Series B — a $15M–$40M round). Valuation is modeled from stage benchmarks scaled by the technology sector profile. Directional, not a quoted figure.
Benchmarked against 21302 companies in Other Technology. Each bar is a median (the middle company, not an average — outliers don't skew it). Two yardsticks: real money raised (reported on Form D) and modeled value (our estimate est.). These are whole-sector medians across all stages, except the per-stage row.
Raised more than 95% of sector peers (real $). Modeled value above 71% of peers (estimate).
A tighter cohort than the sector chart above — only companies at the same stage (Series B) that last raised in the same ~3-year era, ranked by modeled value est. (not money raised). This is the exact set the analyst read compares against, so a like-for-like cohort is what makes "over/under-valued" meaningful. This company ranks #414 of 514.
| Company | Stage | Raised · real | Value · est | vs peer med. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contabilizei Co | Series B | $66.4M | $708.5M | 3.30× |
| Skan, Inc. | Series B | $39.3M | $685.3M | 3.19× |
| Design Barn Inc. | Series B | $37.0M | $663.3M | 3.09× |
| SKAEL, Inc. | Series B | $37.9M | $659.0M | 3.07× |
| Maze.Design, Inc. | Series B | $57.0M | $650.4M | 3.03× |
| Infinity Stones Inc. | Series B | $78.9M | $649.1M | 3.02× |
| GridX, Inc. | Series B | $54.7M | $623.9M | 2.90× |
| Convictional, Inc. | Series B | $43.4M | $609.3M | 2.84× |
| SourceDay, Inc. | Series B | $58.0M | $599.9M | 2.79× |
| Xatabase, Inc. | Series B | $35.0M | $596.6M | 2.78× |
| Concord SCC Ltd | Series B | $39.8M | $585.6M | 2.73× |
| sovrn Holdings, Inc. | Series B | $80.4M | $560.0M | 2.61× |
| T-Rex Group, Inc. this company | Series B | $66.6M | $98.5M | 0.46× |
Stage is inferred from round size est., not reported on the filing — a round's dollar size maps to a bucket: Pre-Seed <$1.0M · Seed $1.0M–$4.0M · Series A $4.0M–$15M · Series B $15M–$40M · Series C $40M–$100M · Series D+ $100M–$400M · Growth/Late >$400M.
| Stage | Amount · real | Announced | Post-money · est | Value · est | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed | $1.2M | 2013-12-24 | $5.9M | $40.0M | 85% |
| Seed | $1.0M | 2015-12-21 | $5.2M | $35.6M | 85% |
| Series A | $7.3M | 2016-11-15 | $33.3M | $203.0M | 90% |
| Series A | $13.4M | 2019-02-26 | $60.8M | $370.8M | 90% |
| Series A | $5.4M | 2019-02-26 | $24.4M | $149.0M | 90% |
| Series B | $33.7M | 2022-01-18 | $187.5M | $596.6M | 90% |
| Series B | $10.0M | 2023-09-18 | $55.6M | $98.5M | 90% |
Step-up, pace versus the sector's normal cadence, and revenue/exemption moves — read straight from the reported round facts reported.
Predictive signals are modeled est. from this company's own cadence and step-up, plus sector benchmarks — directional, not advice. Peer set and a CSV export live in your analyst workspace.
Officers, directors and promoters named in this company's public recordsreported — the people who run it (not its investors). "Also runs" counts come from name-matching across all records, so verify before acting.
| Person | Role | Also runs | Tied since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander B. Weiss | — | — | 2022-01 |
| Arad B. Shaiber | — | — | 2022-01 |
| Benjamin B. Cohen | — | — | 2013-12 |
| Benjamin B. Golden | — | — | 2022-01 |
| Charles B. Howe | — | — | 2022-01 |
| Cynthia B. Kueppers | — | — | 2022-01 |
| Daniel B. Tsiddon | — | — | 2022-01 |
| David B. Heron | — | — | 2015-12 |
| Geoff B. Patsch | — | — | 2023-09 |
| Geoffrey B. Patsch | — | — | 2022-01 |
| James B. Everett | — | — | 2015-12 |
| James B. McEntee | — | — | 2015-12 |
| Jonathan B. Stern | — | — | 2022-01 |
| Krishna B. Balachander | — | — | 2023-09 |
| Martina B. Aufiero | — | — | 2016-11 |
| Santiago B. Suarez | — | — | 2019-02 |
| Sasha B. Brown | — | — | 2019-02 |
| Scott B. Condron | — | — | 2022-01 |
| Sean B. Schickendanz | — | — | 2013-12 |
| Steve B. Grenfell | — | — | 2019-02 |
| Suraj B. Nekram | — | — | 2023-09 |
| Tim B. Wang | — | — | 2019-02 |
| Tricia B. San Cristobal | — | — | 2022-01 |
T-Rex Group, Inc. is an official record sourced from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). U.S. data is aggregated from SEC Form D filings.
Nearest neighbours across the whole database — matched on sector, stage and capital scale, and on shared operators (officers or directors named at both companies in public filings). A discovery shortlist, not a valuation cohort — verify before acting, the same way modeled figures are directional.
| Company | Sector | Stage | Raised · real | Value · est | Why similar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digonex Technologies Inc | Other Technology | Series B | $65.1M | $100.7M | same sector · same stage |
| Salted Inc. | Other Technology | Series B | $60.3M | $96.2M | same sector · same stage |
| LevitasBio, Inc. | Other Technology | Series B | $73.8M | $96.3M | same sector · same stage |
| Tesouro HQ, Inc. | Other Technology | Series B | $42.4M | $96.5M | same sector · same stage |
| Z League Inc | Other Technology | Series B | $38.7M | $95.2M | same sector · same stage |
| Zealot Networks, Inc. | Other Technology | Series B | $36.9M | $101.8M | same sector · same stage |
| Bigleaf Networks, Inc. | Other Technology | Series B | $35.9M | $96.5M | same sector · same stage |
| Aiera, Inc. | Other Technology | Series B | $34.5M | $96.4M | same sector · same stage |
Matched by meaning, not labels — a local language model reads each company's name, sector and description and ranks the closest in that learned space. This catches look-alikes that cross sector boundaries; the structured list above explains its matches, this one trusts the text. Directional, like every modeled signal here.
| Company | Sector | Stage | Value · est | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T-REXecom, Inc. | Other | Pre-Seed | $5.9M | 88% |
| TNGO Group Holdings, Inc. | Other Technology | Pre-Seed | $3.6M | 86% |
| T-Worx Holdings, LLC | Other Technology | Seed | $67.9M | 85% |
| tldraw, Inc. | Other Technology | Series A | $57.5M | 85% |
| Spearfish Group, Inc. | Other Technology | Pre-Seed | $2.4M | 85% |
| TMPO Corp. | Other Technology | Pre-Seed | $277K | 85% |
| Tettra, Inc. | Other Technology | Pre-Seed | $38.4M | 85% |
| NewType Group, Inc. | Other Technology | Pre-Seed | $1.9M | 85% |
See where T-Rex Group, Inc. sits in the wider market — its sector, location and stage cohorts, each with their own leaderboards and capital-flow timelines.
If you work at T-Rex Group, Inc., claim this profile or suggest a correction. We aggregate from public filings, so help us keep your description, website and links accurate.
Is this your company? Update your profile or add contact details — and choose exactly who can reach you. Reviewed before anything is published.