Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

Syrcuit Energy Solutions, Inc.

Syrcuit Energy Solutions, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is at-risk on financing cadence.

WatchOverdue for a raise versus sector cadence — could be a bridge, a down round, or distress. Watch for the next filing.

Businessfiled

Syrcuit Energy Solutions, Inc. operates in Other Energy, based in Denver.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Syrcuit Energy Solutions, Inc. has raised $11M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $6.0M on 2021-11-10.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2024-05-15.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Syrcuit Energy Solutions, Inc. at approximately $20M (range $6.5M–$45M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.60× the median modeled value of Series A Other Energy companies in 2022–2024 (105 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Issuer reports $0–$1M revenue while modeled below niche peers.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 30 months.

Last raise 2.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 12 months.

Past due for a raise versus sector cadence — watch for distress or a bridge.

The last round was 1.2× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 71% of Other Energy peers (2049 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 53% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Versogen, Inc., Juhl Clean Energy Assets, Inc., UtilityAPI, Inc., Premier Uranium, Inc., Controlled Thermal Resources Holdings Inc..

Peoplefiled

9 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Overdue for a raise versus sector norm — distress or bridge risk.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.