Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

SyncBak, Inc.

SyncBak, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

SyncBak, Inc. operates in Other, based in MARION.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

SyncBak, Inc. has raised $18M in disclosed capital across 6 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $5.3M on —.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2013-02-05.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models SyncBak, Inc. at approximately $30M (range $2.7M–$165M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.34× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2013–2015 (623 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 103 months.

Last raise 13.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 2.0× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 84% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 63% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Biloxi Baseball, LLC, United Sample Inc, Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc., County Waste of Virginia, LLC, Marathon Patent Group, Inc..

Peoplefiled

7 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.