Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 1, 2026

Sunset Meadows, LLC

Sunset Meadows, LLC looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Sunset Meadows, LLC operates in Other, based in TUCSON.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Sunset Meadows, LLC has raised $11M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $11M on 2023-05-04.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2023-05-04.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Sunset Meadows, LLC at approximately $68M (range $14M–$191M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.74× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2022–2024 (1135 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Issuer reports no revenue, yet is modeled well above niche peers.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 3.2 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 78% of Other peers (25008 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 77% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Ness Well, Inc., Quantori, Inc., Applause Network TV, Inc., Qquv Investments 5, Llc, Trustworthy Co.

Peoplefiled

13 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.