Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Suiteness, Inc.

Suiteness, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Suiteness, Inc. operates in Other, based in OAKLAND, CA, USA; Oakland, CA, USA; Remote. Book guaranteed connecting rooms and suites at hotels

Sub-sector tags: Consumer, Travel, Leisure and Tourism.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Suiteness, Inc. has raised $6.0M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $6.0M on 2016-12-05.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2016-12-05.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Suiteness, Inc. at approximately $91M (range $8.2M–$494M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.03× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2016–2018 (707 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (103% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 9.6 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 70% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 82% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Hogsalt Investors Llc, Fanchise League Co LLC, CannCare, Inc, Baba Joe Diamond Ventures Us Inc., Instapage, Inc..

Peoplefiled

2 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.