Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Square Enix Holdings Co., Ltd.

Square Enix Holdings Co., Ltd. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Square Enix Holdings Co., Ltd. operates in Other, based in TOKYO.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Square Enix Holdings Co., Ltd. has raised $1.3M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $1.3M on 2018-10-15.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2018-10-15.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Square Enix Holdings Co., Ltd. at approximately $25M (range $1.2M–$196M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.73× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2016–2018 (1003 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (73% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 7.7 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 42% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 59% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Zooba Eats, Inc., EQX Capital, Inc., Alliance Time Holdings, LLC, Springfield Hockey, LLC, Spring Hill Development Partners, LLC.

Peoplefiled

2 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.