Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Spring Awakening Touring Lp

Spring Awakening Touring Lp looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Spring Awakening Touring Lp operates in Other, based in NEW YORK.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Spring Awakening Touring Lp has raised $3.0M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $3.0M on 2008-05-12.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2008-05-12.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Spring Awakening Touring Lp at approximately $56M (range $2.7M–$438M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.50× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2007–2009 (281 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (150% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 18.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 57% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 73% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Secret Ridge Estates, L.L.C., Pluribus Entertainment LLC, EPI Holdings, Pbsj Corp /Fl/, Haney Transportation & Logistics, LLC.

Peoplefiled

4 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.