Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Spherion Corp

Spherion Corp looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Spherion Corp operates in Other, based in Ft. Lauderdale.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Spherion Corp has raised $11M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $11M on 2010-02-01.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2010-02-01.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Spherion Corp at approximately $173M (range $16M–$939M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.90× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2010–2012 (632 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 16.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 79% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 88% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Worldview Entertainment Capital Llc, Applied Merchant Systems West Coast, Inc., SWMF Life Science Venture Fund, Limited Partnership, PrimaLoft Holding Company, LLC, Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc..

Peoplefiled

12 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.