Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

Southfield Tier One Investment Lp

Southfield Tier One Investment Lp looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Southfield Tier One Investment Lp operates in Other, based in GREENWICH.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Southfield Tier One Investment Lp has raised $26M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series B (a $15M–$40M round).

Largest single filing: $20M on 2016-02-04.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2016-08-04.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Southfield Tier One Investment Lp at approximately $93M (range $14M–$359M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.28× the median modeled value of Series B Other companies in 2016–2018 (298 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 6 months.

Last raise 9.9 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 3.6× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 88% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 82% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: EIP Investment Holdings, LLC, HD MSouth Holdings, LLC, Aston Holding Corp., AirClean Holdings, Inc., Westminster Virginia LP.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.