Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Solarlytics, Inc.

Solarlytics, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Solarlytics, Inc. operates in Other, based in WALNUT CREEK.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Solarlytics, Inc. has raised $1.5M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $1.5M on 2015-02-24.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2015-02-24.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Solarlytics, Inc. at approximately $28M (range $1.3M–$219M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.86× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (998 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (86% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 11.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 43% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 61% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Bodri Capital Management, LLC, as Trustee under that certain Declaration of Trust dated December 17, 2015, 76826774, Llc, 76826773, Llc, 76826772, Llc, EW Investor, LLC.

Peoplefiled

6 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.