Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

SNIP Inc.

SNIP Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

SNIP Inc. operates in Other, based in NEW YORK.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

SNIP Inc. has raised $5.4M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $5.4M on 2012-08-16.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2012-08-16.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models SNIP Inc. at approximately $82M (range $7.4M–$447M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.90× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2010–2012 (632 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (90% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 13.9 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 68% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 80% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Worldview Entertainment Capital Llc, Applied Merchant Systems West Coast, Inc., SWMF Life Science Venture Fund, Limited Partnership, PrimaLoft Holding Company, LLC, Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc..

Peoplefiled

3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.