Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Sionix Corp

Sionix Corp looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Sionix Corp operates in Other, based in LOS ANGELES.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Sionix Corp has raised $2.5M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $1.3M on 2011-04-06.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2011-04-06.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Sionix Corp at approximately $24M (range $1.1M–$185M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.70× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2010–2012 (877 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (70% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 248 months.

Last raise 15.2 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.0× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 53% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 58% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Carsmetics Socal Group, Llc, Hot Flashes, LLC, Watermill-MPI Partners, L.P., Insituform Technologies Inc, Aquantis, Inc..

Peoplefiled

6 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.