Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Singly, Inc.

Singly, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Singly, Inc. operates in Other, based in SAN FRANCISCO.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Singly, Inc. has raised $10M in disclosed capital across 3 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $6.5M on 2012-04-06.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2012-04-06.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Singly, Inc. at approximately $98M (range $8.8M–$532M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.08× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2010–2012 (632 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (108% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 7 months.

Last raise 14.2 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 4.1× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 78% of Other peers (25008 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 83% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: SWMF Life Science Venture Fund, Limited Partnership, PrimaLoft Holding Company, LLC, Applied Merchant Systems West Coast, Inc., Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc., Avi-Spl Holdings, Inc..

Peoplefiled

3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.