Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Simon & Schuster Holding Co LLC

Simon & Schuster Holding Co LLC looks fair against its niche peers and is at-risk on financing cadence.

WatchOverdue for a raise versus sector cadence — could be a bridge, a down round, or distress. Watch for the next filing.

Businessfiled

Simon & Schuster Holding Co LLC operates in Other, based in New York. Find new book releases, best sellers lists and see when your favorite author is making their next appearance.Simon & Schuster is your one stop online book store for book and author news.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Simon & Schuster Holding Co LLC has raised $600M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Growth/Late (a round over $400M).

Largest single filing: $600M on 2023-10-30.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2023-10-30.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Simon & Schuster Holding Co LLC at approximately $7.3B (range $4.7B–$9.9B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.00× the median modeled value of Growth/Late Other companies in 2022–2024 (25 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (100% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 2.7 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Past due for a raise versus sector cadence — watch for distress or a bridge.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 100% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 100% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Oranje Topco, Inc., Icefall Topco, Inc., Disco Topco, Inc., Staubach Topco, Inc., Arkady HoldCo, Inc..

Peoplefiled

8 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Overdue for a raise versus sector norm — distress or bridge risk.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.