Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

ShipSweet, LLC

ShipSweet, LLC looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

ShipSweet, LLC operates in Other, based in SEATTLE.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

ShipSweet, LLC has raised $1.5M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $908K on 2011-06-09.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2011-11-21.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models ShipSweet, LLC at approximately $14M (range $403K–$158M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.85× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2010–2012 (1459 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 5 months.

Last raise 14.6 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 1.5× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 45% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 45% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Crown Rock Lenders, LLC, Lucas Venture Group V, LLC, Attitude Drinks Inc., Direct 2 Manufacturer, LLC, Suter Joshua Scott.

Peoplefiled

10 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.