Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
Sea Monster
Sea Monster looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
Sea Monster operates in Gaming, based in Cape Town, Africa. SA entertainment startup Sea Monster secures $1m funding 0 By Tom Jackson on July 16, 2020 News , Southern Africa Cape Town-based animation, gaming and AR/VR company Sea Monster has raised US$1 million in funding to help change the way corporates tackle training and communication globally. Formed in 2011, Sea Monster creates engaging, memorable digital content and experiences using animation and games that drive business and social outcomes.
Sub-sector tags: gaming.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
Sea Monster has raised $1.0M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).
Largest single filing: $1.0M on 2020-07-16.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2020-07-16.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models Sea Monster at approximately $27M (range $587K–$299M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 3.36× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Gaming companies in 2019–2021 (19 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Last raise 6.0 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 12 months.
Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 64% of Gaming peers (344 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 77% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Maximum Games, Inc., Wichita Esports LLC, Gaming Revolution for International Development Inc., Sunspear Games, Inc., Coastal Game Stuidos LLC.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.