Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

Santiago Columbia Village Llc

Santiago Columbia Village Llc looks under-valued against its niche peers and is active on financing cadence.

SourceModeled below same-niche peers while still financing on rhythm — a potential mispricing worth a closer look.

Businessfiled

Santiago Columbia Village Llc operates in Other, based in ORANGE.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Santiago Columbia Village Llc has raised $3.4M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $3.3M on 2021-04-01.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2025-05-01.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Santiago Columbia Village Llc at approximately $324K (range $95K–$689K). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.06× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2025–2027 (516 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Issuer reports $0–$1M revenue while modeled below niche peers.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 49 months.

Last raise 14 mo ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Raising on or ahead of the sector's normal rhythm.

The last round was 31.2× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 59% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 1% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Council Senior BTR Investors, LLC, Infineo Global, LP, SRE Venture 724, LLC, Bernadette De Lourdes Development Llc, Keep Moving Inc..

Peoplefiled

2 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.