Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Sabre Defence Industries, Inc.

Sabre Defence Industries, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Sabre Defence Industries, Inc. operates in Other, based in MCKINNEY.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Sabre Defence Industries, Inc. has raised $435K in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $250K on 2014-06-17.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-06-17.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Sabre Defence Industries, Inc. at approximately $5.8M (range $167K–$66M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.71× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (1650 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (71% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 1 months.

Last raise 12.0 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.4× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 21% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 28% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Waterblue IV LLC, Fairway America Fund VI, LLC, LoanTek, Inc., Roosevelt Way Investment, L.P., West Coast Customs Inc.

Peoplefiled

3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.