Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

RWA Holding Company, Inc.

RWA Holding Company, Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

RWA Holding Company, Inc. operates in Other, based in EVERETT.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

RWA Holding Company, Inc. has raised $31M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series B (a $15M–$40M round).

Largest single filing: $31M on 2015-05-11.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2015-05-11.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models RWA Holding Company, Inc. at approximately $523M (range $79M–$2.0B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.52× the median modeled value of Series B Other companies in 2013–2015 (273 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 11.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 90% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 94% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: PL Parent, LLC, ComplexCare Holdings, Inc., Sprinklr, Inc., Globaltranz Enterprises, Inc., Halco Acquisition Corp.

Peoplefiled

5 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.