Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Royal Nickel Corp

Royal Nickel Corp looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Royal Nickel Corp operates in Other, based in TORONTO.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Royal Nickel Corp has raised $1.1M in disclosed capital across 5 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $400K on 2016-05-20.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2022-06-15.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Royal Nickel Corp at approximately $2.5M (range $173K–$16M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.26× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2022–2024 (1723 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (126% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 15 months.

Last raise 4.0 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.7× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 39% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 15% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: El American Inc., AEA Hope, LLC, Joy Milk Tea Inc., Manage Mindfully, Inc., ValiDateMe LLC.

Peoplefiled

24 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.