ROM Technologies, Inc.☆Watch⊞Compare

Analyst read est. — computed against this company's niche peers in the same era. Inputs shown; not a quoted figure.

Procedural diagnosis est. — rule-based common-sense checks over the filing pattern, issuer name, activity cadence, and surfaced operating evidence.

ROM Technologies, Inc. behaves more like a recurring private-offering issuer than a conventional venture-backed operating company.

No named principal in this company's public records yet — see all operators below.

Explore how these operators interlock with other companies in the operator network.

ROM Technologies, Inc. is one of 3920 Software / Tech companies tracked from BROOKFIELD. By capital raised it ranks among the largest (ahead of 100% of sector peers), and mid-pack by modeled valuation est..

Ranking is computed against this company's own sector cohort — reported capital is fact; valuation tiers are modeled.

As reported in public records reported — not modeled.

This issuer has a dense recurring filing history, so the chart groups filings by year. Solid bars are annual reported capital reported; hatched bars show the latest modeled value est. observed in that year. Use the toggles to overlay data labels and the niche-peer / market average value lines.

This looks like a recurring offering series, so a VC stage ladder would be misleading. Showing the filed offering sequence instead.

Showing first 24 of 47 filings to keep the sequence readable.

This issuer files recurring offerings, so the model treats stage labels as a loose sizing heuristic, not a clean VC ladder. The estimate anchors on reported filing amounts and dates, then applies benchmark dilution, survival, and markup assumptions. Directional, not a quoted figure.

Benchmarked against 3920 companies in Software / Tech. Each bar is a median (the middle company, not an average — outliers don't skew it). Two yardsticks: real money raised (reported on Form D) and modeled value (our estimate est.). These are whole-sector medians across all stages, except the per-stage row.

Raised more than 100% of sector peers (real $). Modeled value above 63% of peers (estimate).

This issuer files too frequently for VC stage labels to be meaningful, so rows are shown as initial/follow-on offerings est. instead of Pre-Seed/Seed/Series buckets.

Step-up, pace versus the sector's normal cadence, and revenue/exemption moves — read straight from the reported round facts reported.

1. Initial offering$448.1M2014-09-15
   • First recorded raise — entered as Initial offering.
   • 3,556 investors on this round.
2. Follow-on offering$200K2014-09-15
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 2240.3× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
   • 63 investors on this round.
3. Follow-on offering$185K2014-12-15
   • Came back fast: 3 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
   • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
   • Revenue band moved $25M–$100M → $0–$1M.
   • 4 investors on this round.
4. Follow-on offering$900K2015-07-09
   • Came back fast: 7 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
   • Round 4.9× larger than the prior — scaling up.
   • Revenue band moved $0–$1M → No revenue.
   • 18 investors on this round.
5. Follow-on offering$900K2015-07-09
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
   • 18 investors on this round.
6. Follow-on offering$45.4M2015-09-15
   • Came back fast: 2 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
   • Round 50.4× larger than the prior — scaling up.
   • Revenue band moved No revenue → $5M–$25M.
   • Switched to Rule 506(b) (was Rule 506(c)).
   • 1,133 investors on this round.
7. Follow-on offering$75.5M2015-09-15
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 1.7× larger than the prior — scaling up.
   • Switched to Rule 506(c) (was Rule 506(b)).
   • 1,689 investors on this round.
8. Follow-on offering$27.2M2015-09-15
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 2.8× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
   • Revenue band moved $5M–$25M → $0–$1M.
   • 767 investors on this round.
9. Follow-on offering$20.9M2015-09-15
   • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
   • Round 1.3× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
   • 631 investors on this round.
10. Follow-on offering$32.1M2015-09-15
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.5× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Revenue band moved $0–$1M → $1M–$5M.
    • 867 investors on this round.
11. Follow-on offering$56.7M2015-09-15
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.8× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Revenue band moved $1M–$5M → $5M–$25M.
    • 1,348 investors on this round.
12. Follow-on offering$77.6M2015-09-15
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.4× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 1,720 investors on this round.
13. Follow-on offering$200K2015-09-15
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 387.8× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • Revenue band moved $5M–$25M → $25M–$100M.
    • 446 investors on this round.
14. Follow-on offering$41.5M2015-09-15
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 207.7× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Revenue band moved $25M–$100M → $1M–$5M.
    • 1,062 investors on this round.
15. Follow-on offering$49.2M2015-09-15
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • Revenue band moved $1M–$5M → $5M–$25M.
    • 1,206 investors on this round.
16. Follow-on offering$80.7M2015-09-15
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.6× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • 1,766 investors on this round.
17. Follow-on offering$1.1M2015-09-15
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 76.8× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • Revenue band moved $5M–$25M → $1M–$5M.
    • 14 investors on this round.
18. Follow-on offering$37.2M2015-09-15
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 35.5× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Revenue band moved $1M–$5M → $5M–$25M.
    • 985 investors on this round.
19. Follow-on offering$45.4M2015-09-15
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 1,133 investors on this round.
20. Follow-on offering$1.4M2015-09-16
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 32.1× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • Revenue band moved $5M–$25M → $0–$1M.
    • 174 investors on this round.
21. Follow-on offering$1.4M2015-09-16
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 174 investors on this round.
22. Follow-on offering$500K2017-08-10
    • Raised again after 23 mo — slower than the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 2.8× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 22 investors on this round.
23. Follow-on offering$500K2017-08-10
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 22 investors on this round.
24. Follow-on offering$570K2018-08-27
    • Raised 13 mo later, in step with the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 10 investors on this round.
25. Follow-on offering$570K2018-08-27
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 10 investors on this round.
26. Follow-on offering$665K2018-11-06
    • Came back fast: 2 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 18 investors on this round.
27. Follow-on offering$665K2018-11-06
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 18 investors on this round.
28. Follow-on offering$1.5M2019-07-01
    • Raised 8 mo later, in step with the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 2.3× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Revenue band moved $0–$1M → No revenue.
29. Follow-on offering$2.0M2020-12-31
    • Raised 18 mo later, in step with the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 1.3× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Revenue band moved No revenue → $0–$1M.
30. Follow-on offering$2.0M2021-01-05
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
31. Follow-on offering$2.1M2021-07-21
    • Came back fast: 6 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • Revenue band moved $0–$1M → $1M–$5M.
    • 42 investors on this round.
32. Follow-on offering$1.1M2021-08-23
    • Came back fast: 1 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 2.0× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 14 investors on this round.
33. Follow-on offering$1.1M2022-01-13
    • Came back fast: 5 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 1 investor on this round.
34. Follow-on offering$375K2022-04-04
    • Came back fast: 3 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 2.9× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • Revenue band moved $1M–$5M → $5M–$25M.
    • Switched to Rule 506(b) (was Rule 506(c)).
    • 8 investors on this round.
35. Follow-on offering$201K2022-04-15
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.9× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • Switched to Rule 506(c) (was Rule 506(b)).
    • 6 investors on this round.
36. Follow-on offering$100K2022-08-25
    • Came back fast: 4 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 2.0× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • Switched to Rule 506(b) (was Rule 506(c)).
    • 1 investor on this round.
37. Follow-on offering$10.0M2023-01-13
    • Came back fast: 5 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 100.0× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Switched to Rule 506(c) (was Rule 506(b)).
38. Follow-on offering$10.0M2023-01-31
    • Came back fast: 1 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
39. Follow-on offering$10.0M2023-03-02
    • Came back fast: 1 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • Switched to Rule 506(b) (was Rule 506(c)).
40. Follow-on offering$10.0M2023-10-18
    • Came back fast: 8 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • Revenue band moved $5M–$25M → $25M–$100M.
    • Switched to Rule 506(c) (was Rule 506(b)).
41. Follow-on offering$10.0M2023-12-29
    • Came back fast: 2 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
42. Follow-on offering$200K2024-01-19
    • Came back fast: 1 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 50.0× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • Switched to Rule 506(b) (was Rule 506(c)).
    • 5 investors on this round.
43. Follow-on offering$10.0M2024-05-24
    • Came back fast: 4 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 50.0× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Switched to Rule 506(c) (was Rule 506(b)).
44. Follow-on offering$20.0M2024-06-07
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 2.0× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Switched to Rule 506(b) (was Rule 506(c)).
45. Follow-on offering$5.0M2024-11-15
    • Came back fast: 5 mo vs the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 4.0× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • Switched to Rule 506(c) (was Rule 506(b)).
46. Follow-on offering$10.0M2024-11-29
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 2.0× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Switched to Rule 506(b) (was Rule 506(c)).
47. Follow-on offering$1.5M2025-07-24
    • Raised 8 mo later, in step with the ~13 mo sector norm.
    • Round 6.7× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • Revenue band moved $25M–$100M → No revenue.
    • Switched to Rule 506(c) (was Rule 506(b)).

Predictive signals are modeled est. from this company's own cadence and step-up, plus sector benchmarks — directional, not advice. Peer set and a CSV export live in your analyst workspace.

Officers, directors and promoters named in this company's public recordsreported — the people who run it (not its investors). "Also runs" counts come from name-matching across all records, so verify before acting.

ROM Technologies, Inc. is an official record sourced from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). U.S. data is aggregated from SEC Form D filings.

Nearest neighbours across the whole database — matched on sector, stage and capital scale, and on shared operators (officers or directors named at both companies in public filings). A discovery shortlist, not a valuation cohort — verify before acting, the same way modeled figures are directional.

Matched by meaning, not labels — a local language model reads each company's name, sector and description and ranks the closest in that learned space. This catches look-alikes that cross sector boundaries; the structured list above explains its matches, this one trusts the text. Directional, like every modeled signal here.

See where ROM Technologies, Inc. sits in the wider market — its sector, location and stage cohorts, each with their own leaderboards and capital-flow timelines.

If you work at ROM Technologies, Inc., claim this profile or suggest a correction. We aggregate from public filings, so help us keep your description, website and links accurate.