Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Rodo Inc.

Rodo Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Rodo Inc. operates in Other, based in New York.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Rodo Inc. has raised $41M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series B (a $15M–$40M round).

Largest single filing: $23M on 2018-02-14.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2021-06-25.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Rodo Inc. at approximately $232M (range $44M–$740M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.78× the median modeled value of Series B Other companies in 2019–2021 (371 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (78% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 40 months.

Last raise 5.0 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 1.3× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 92% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 90% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: MStar Holding Corp, Chlorum Solutions Llc, IFS Management Holdco, LLC, Benefit Recovery Group, LLC, Shenandoah Growers, Inc..

Peoplefiled

4 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.