Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Roblox Corp

Roblox Corp looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Roblox Corp operates in Other, based in San Mateo.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Roblox Corp has raised $579M in disclosed capital across 4 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Growth/Late (a round over $400M).

Largest single filing: $520M on 2021-01-06.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2022-04-01.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Roblox Corp at approximately $258M (range $138M–$400M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.04× the median modeled value of Growth/Late Other companies in 2022–2024 (25 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Issuer reports $100M+ revenue while modeled below niche peers.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 30 months.

Last raise 4.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.7× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 100% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 90% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Oranje Topco, Inc., Icefall Topco, Inc., Disco Topco, Inc., Staubach Topco, Inc., Arkady HoldCo, Inc..

Peoplefiled

18 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.