Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Rivulet Media, Inc.

Rivulet Media, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is at-risk on financing cadence.

WatchOverdue for a raise versus sector cadence — could be a bridge, a down round, or distress. Watch for the next filing.

Businessfiled

Rivulet Media, Inc. operates in Media & Content, based in GILBERT.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Rivulet Media, Inc. has raised $8.9M in disclosed capital across 10 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $2.9M on 2023-04-27.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2023-05-25.

Filings read as a recurring offering program rather than a clean venture-stage ladder — interpret stage labels and step-ups with that in mind.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Rivulet Media, Inc. at approximately $7.6M (range $1.1M–$27M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.70× the median modeled value of Seed Media & Content companies in 2022–2024 (73 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (70% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 2 months.

Last raise 3.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 12 months.

Past due for a raise versus sector cadence — watch for distress or a bridge.

The last round was 1.9× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 82% of Media & Content peers (1052 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 50% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Duluth Pictures Llc, Dreamcatcher Entertainment Group, Llc, Equal Entertainment LLC, Speedvision Media Group, Inc., Wonder Works Studio Inc..

Peoplefiled

7 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Overdue for a raise versus sector norm — distress or bridge risk.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.

Recurring-offering pattern: stage-based valuation has lower applicability.