Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc.
Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc. operates in Other, based in Stamford.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc. has raised $19M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).
Largest single filing: $15M on 2013-08-22.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2013-08-22.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc. at approximately $227M (range $20M–$1.2B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 2.57× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2013–2015 (623 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 50 months.
Last raise 12.9 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
The last round stepped up 3.9× from the prior — scaling.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 85% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 90% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Biloxi Baseball, LLC, United Sample Inc, County Waste of Virginia, LLC, Marathon Patent Group, Inc., New Gold Recovery USA, Inc..
Peoplefiled
10 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.